Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul-Dec;28(2):272-277.
doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_53_16. Epub 2020 Aug 14.

Psychological morbidity in soldiers after spinal cord injury

Affiliations

Psychological morbidity in soldiers after spinal cord injury

T Madhusudan et al. Ind Psychiatry J. 2019 Jul-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) patients usually experience multiple and ongoing, neurological, and other medical problems with significant damage to the social and psychological well-being of themselves and their families.

Materials and methods: Soldiers with SCI transferred to the regional centre after suitable stabilization of their fractures and general physical condition were included in the study. The baseline assessment included a diagnostic interview and review of case notes for a comprehensive, multi-axial diagnosis. The participants were assessed using the Barthel's Index, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the General Health Questionnaire, Quality of life (QOL) Index, AFMC stressful life event Scale, and the Social Support Survey with the current defense or coping style also being recorded. Similar assessments were repeated at 1 month, 6 months, and at 1 year after intake.

Results: It was noticed that the mean scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were below the cut-off point for diagnosable disorder, or in the mild end of the spectrum. However, the measures of psychological distress and QOL showed significantly high mean scores. Anxiety Scores showed little variation over time initially, and none of the mean differences (t values) reached statistical significance. However, when the scores of intake and those at 6 months are compared, there was a statistically significant improvement. Depression scores, on the other hand, showed a steady improvement with each assessment. General lack of well-being and psychological distress along with poor QOL remained high throughout the period of assessment with little variation over time .These morbidity measures could not be accounted for by variations in stressful life-event scores or by variations in degree of disability. Although the negative correlation between anxiety and depression scores and those on the QOL index approached conventional levels of significance, there was little correlation overall between morbidity measures and the putative modifying variables at any stage of assessment.

Conclusions: Although psychological symptoms of depressive and anxious spectrum was virtually universal, psychiatric illness at syndromal intensity warranting a formal psychiatric referral and management was rare in patients with SCI in the 1st year. The general well-being and QOL were expectedly dismal throughout. Expected correlations between the measures of social support and degree of disability with the measures of anxiety, depression, subjective distress, and QOL were not demonstrated .There is a need to look beyond these and explore factors such as lack of information, physical morbidity, quality of social support, and dependence for the activities of daily living to evolve a nuanced approach toward the challenge that these clientele represent.

Keywords: Anxiety; depression; disability; quality of life; spinal cord injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Based on an AFMRC project 3479/2006.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alpert Michelle J. In: Essentials of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Frontera WR, Silver JK, editors. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus Inc; 2002. pp. 753–4.
    1. Tator Charles H, Skaf Ghassan S. In: Neurology in Clinical Practice: Butterworth – Heinemann. Bradley WG, Doroff RB, Fenichel GM, Marsden DC, editors. 2002. pp. 1089–110.
    1. Mahoney FI, Word OH, Barthel DW. Rehabilitation of chronically ill patients. South Med J. 1955;51:605–9. - PubMed
    1. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: A reliability study. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10:61–3. - PubMed
    1. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32:705–14. - PubMed