Episiotomy related morbidities measured using redness, edema, ecchymosis, discharge and apposition scale and numerical pain scale among primiparous women in Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
- PMID: 33224413
- PMCID: PMC7664137
- DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2020.36.347.25049
Episiotomy related morbidities measured using redness, edema, ecchymosis, discharge and apposition scale and numerical pain scale among primiparous women in Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
Abstract
Introduction: episiotomy induced inflammatory signs like redness, edema, ecchymosis and pain may remain beyond the period of hospitalization and can be objectively measured using redness, edema, ecchymosis, discharge and apposition (REEDA) scale. Pain in the postpartum period is a common problem and can be measured using the numerical pain scale (NPS). Episiotomy is normally poorly executed and poorly repaired with little attention to the subtle pain-free scar. Postpartum perineal pain has been found to affect more people with episiotomy compared to spontaneous perineal tears or contusion in the first two weeks. This study was aimed at comparing NPS and REEDA scores in the first two weeks of postpartum among primiparous parturients with or without episiotomy in Mulago National Referral Hospital.
Methods: a prospective cohort study conducted by recruiting primiparous women systematically on the first postnatal day and categorizing them into episiotomy and no episiotomy group. NPS and REEDA scale were taken at baseline and 2 weeks postpartum.
Results: the mean total REEDA score for primiparous women among the episiotomy group was significantly higher both on day 1 and day 14 with p-values <0.0001 and <0.0001 respectively as well as the day 14 mean NPS p-value 0.001.
Conclusion: episiotomy, a traumatic obstetric procedure, that heals slowly and with persistent perineal pain compare to spontaneous perineal contusion or tears.
Keywords: Episiotomy; REEDA scale; numerical pain scale; primiparity.
Copyright: Pebalo Francis Pebolo et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Borruto F, Comparetto C. Episiotomy: a too often unnecessary and harmful practice. MOJ Womens Health. 2016;2(1):25–26.
-
- Longo LD. A treatise of midwifry, in three parts. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1995;172(4 Part 1):1317–1319. - PubMed
-
- Thacker SB, Banta HD. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature 1860-1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1983;38(6):322–38. - PubMed
-
- Davidson N. REEDA: evaluating postpartum healing. J Nurse Midwifery. 1974;19(2):6–9. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical