Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct;9(5):1653-1662.
doi: 10.21037/gs-2019-catp-22.

The Japanese reporting system for thyroid aspiration cytology 2019 (JRSTAC2019)

Affiliations
Review

The Japanese reporting system for thyroid aspiration cytology 2019 (JRSTAC2019)

Mitsuyoshi Hirokawa et al. Gland Surg. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

We introduce the Japanese reporting system for thyroid aspiration cytology 2019 (JRSTAC2019) proposed by the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Pathology. Pathological classification and recommended clinical management for thyroid nodules in Japan are different from those described in the World Health Organization classification or the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). Therefore, it was necessary to develop a reporting system adapted for Japan. JRSTAC2019 is a modified version of TBSRTC. Currently, JRSTAC2019 is widely used in Japan, although the details of the system have not been introduced in English. JRSTAC2019 comprises seven categories: (I) unsatisfactory, (II) cyst fluid, (III) benign, (IV) undetermined significance, (V) follicular neoplasm (FN), (VI) suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and (VII) malignant. "Cyst fluid" nodules are classified as an independent category, and "recommended management" is in the same category as "benign" nodules. Surgical resection for FN nodules is decided upon by considering several parameters, and the decision is made without performing gene analysis. Non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features tends to be more often diagnosed as papillary carcinoma. The risk of malignancy of SFM in Japan is higher than that in Western countries, and resection rates of SFM and malignant tumors are lower owing to active surveillance for low-risk papillary microcarcinoma. We recommend that each country should develop its reporting system, suitable for its medical and social needs. However, it should be easily compatible with TBSRTC for the ease of academic data sharing.

Keywords: Bethesda system; cyst fluid; fine-needle aspiration cytology; reporting system; thyroid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-2019-catp-22). The series “Asian and Western Practice in Thyroid Pathology: Similarities and Differences” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid 2009;19:1159-65. 10.1089/thy.2009.0274 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American thyroid association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: The American thyroid association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2016;26:1-133. 10.1089/thy.2015.0020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perros P, Boelaert K, Colley S, et al. British thyroid association. Guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2014;81 Suppl 1:1-122. 10.1111/cen.12515 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nardi F, Basolo F, Crescenzi A, et al. Italian consensus for the classification and reporting of thyroid cytology. J Endocrinol Invest 2014;37:593-9. 10.1007/s40618-014-0062-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kumarasinghe MP, Cummings MC, Raymond W, et al. Approach to thyroid cytology: rationale for standardisation. Pathology 2015;47:285-8. 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000268 - DOI - PubMed