Group & save sampling in lumbar decompression: A review into current practice
- PMID: 33225836
- DOI: 10.1177/1750458920950664
Group & save sampling in lumbar decompression: A review into current practice
Abstract
The risks, benefits and technical aspects of surgery require careful consideration. One element of this is the requirement of postoperative blood transfusion. Patients who undergo elective lumbar decompression are at a low risk of requiring a postoperative transfusion yet undergo multiple preoperative group & save tests. For those who are at a low risk of bleeding, a single group & save sample may be adequate. This review analysed the postoperative blood loss and transfusion rate associated with lumbar decompression surgery without fusion in one institution. A subsequent cost analysis and review of the literature was performed. The aim was to assess whether single group & save sampling, within the context of lumbar decompression, was cost effective and amenable to the patient without impacting patient care. Average blood loss was estimated as a drop in Hb of 12.3g/dl. Six patients (14%) had Hb loss of over 20g/dl. No patients underwent a blood transfusion. Through examination of medical records, we found that 65% of patients (35) were suitable for single group & save sampling, estimating a saving of £2415.95 (53%). Selective group & save testing holds economic potential and safeguards patients from undergoing unnecessary testing. The next step after this review would be a prospective multi-centre study.
Keywords: Blood transfusion; Cost analyses; Lumbar decompression; Spinal surgery; Spine; Transfusion.
Similar articles
-
Smoking is Associated with Increased Blood Loss and Transfusion Use After Lumbar Spinal Surgery.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):1019-25. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4650-x. Epub 2015 Dec 7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. PMID: 26642788 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.Spine J. 2013 May;13(5):489-97. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.034. Epub 2012 Dec 5. Spine J. 2013. PMID: 23218509
-
Postoperative Complications in Dialysis-Dependent Patients Undergoing Elective Decompression Surgery Without Fusion or Instrumentation for Degenerative Cervical or Lumbar Lesions.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Sep 1;43(17):1169-1175. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002577. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018. PMID: 30106388
-
Iatrogenic neurologic deficit after lumbar spine surgery: A review.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Dec;139:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.08.022. Epub 2015 Sep 1. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015. PMID: 26386902 Review.
-
The Cell Saver in adult lumbar fusion surgery: a cost-benefit outcomes study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jul 15;29(14):1580-3; discussion 1584. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000131433.05946.4f. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004. PMID: 15247582 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical