Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;66(2):636-645.
doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14633. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

Criminal thinking, certainty of apprehension, and the decision to engage in antisocial behavior: A study of day treatment program clients

Glenn D Walters  1 , Rolando Ponce Jr  2 , Miguel A Piñero  2 , Kimberly D Ernest  2
Affiliations

Criminal thinking, certainty of apprehension, and the decision to engage in antisocial behavior: A study of day treatment program clients

Glenn D Walters et al. J Forensic Sci. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether criminal thinking moderates the relationship between certainty of apprehension (50%, 10%, 1%) and likelihood of engaging in three antisocial hypothetical acts (cheating on a test, property damage, and driving drunk). Proactive criminal thinking (PCT), a manifestation of the planned, calculated, amoral, and instrumental features of antisocial cognition, and reactive criminal thinking (RCT), a reflection of the impulsive, irresponsible, reckless, and emotional aspects of antisocial cognition, served as between-subjects variables in this study. A repeated measures analysis of covariance performed on 67 (43 males, 24 females) day treatment program clients revealed that the likelihood of engaging in antisocial behavior was disproportionately elevated when participants were high in PCT and low in certainty. These results indicate that as the certainty of apprehension goes down, persons with elevated levels of proactive criminal thinking are disproportionately inclined to engage in antisocial and criminal behavior.

Keywords: certainty of apprehension; criminal decision-making; proactive criminal thinking; repeated measures analysis of covariance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Beccaria C. On crimes and punishments (trans. R. Davies). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1995/1764. p. 7-113.
    1. Bentham J. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Whithorn, Scotland: Anodos Books; 2019/1780. p. 7-63.
    1. Nagin DS. Deterrence in the twenty-first century. In: Tonry M, editor. Crime and justice in America: 1975-2025. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2013. p. 199-264.
    1. Paternoster R. How much do we know about criminal deterrence? J Crim Law Crim. 2010;100(3):765-823. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315258089-2.
    1. Cornish DB, Clarke RV. Introduction. In: Cornish DB, Clarke RV, editors. The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New York, NY: Springer; 1985. p. 1-16.

LinkOut - more resources