A commentary on ethical decision-making in the pharmacy profession and the APhA Code of Ethics
- PMID: 33229186
- DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.10.021
A commentary on ethical decision-making in the pharmacy profession and the APhA Code of Ethics
Abstract
The American Pharmacists Association Code of Ethics ("Code") was established in 1852 and has undergone 5 modifications, most recently in 1994. As point of care shifts from product to cognitive clinical service, pharmacists are expected to encounter an increasing quantity and complexity of ethical and moral dilemmas. In view of this professional transformation and current worldwide challenges, this seems an appropriate time for dialogue on a modification of the Code. The 3 important questions before the profession are as follows: (1) Is the scope of available ethical guidance adequate? (2) Are pharmacists competent in ethical decision-making? (3) Is current pharmacy education and training adequately preparing students for ethical decision-making? The first question is included as part of the Pharmacy Law, Ethics, and Risk course at the University of Utah College of Pharmacy. The following commentary is based on a student's persuasive paper that the Code should remain unmodified owing to the following factors: greater detail does not ensure improved guidance, and modification may lead to confusion in professional role and responsibilities and may not consider patients' values and preferences in decision-making. To improve ethical decision-making in the pharmacy profession, this commentary further suggests that questions 2 and 3 are key to facilitating improved readiness and competency in pharmacists' ethical decision-making. Pharmacy students should be given a more thorough education in ethics, and practicing pharmacists should continually expand their knowledge and continued professional development in ethics.
Copyright © 2021 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Exploring Ethical Pharmacy Practice in Jordan.Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Oct;26(5):2809-2834. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00231-3. Epub 2020 Jun 12. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020. PMID: 32533448
-
Perceptions and attitudes of community pharmacists toward professional ethics and ethical dilemmas in the workplace.Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 May;14(5):441-450. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 May 22. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018. PMID: 28551410
-
Hospital pharmacists' ethical exposure and decision-making.Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Feb;17(2):372-380. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Apr 7. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021. PMID: 32284299
-
Exploring pharmacy ethics in developing countries: a scoping review.Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Apr;42(2):418-435. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01021-4. Epub 2020 Apr 10. Int J Clin Pharm. 2020. PMID: 32277402
-
[What kind of ethical education for pharmacists is necessary? Can "the core curriculum model for pharmacology education" provide the needed guidance?].Yakugaku Zasshi. 2009 Jul;129(7):807-13. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.129.807. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2009. PMID: 19571515 Review. Japanese.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials