Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan;31(1):11-17.
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000830.

Robotic radical perineal prostatectomy: tradition and evolution in the robotic era

Affiliations
Review

Robotic radical perineal prostatectomy: tradition and evolution in the robotic era

Paolo Minafra et al. Curr Opin Urol. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose of review: To provide an updated review of robotic radical perineal prostatectomy (r-RPP) with emphasis on the recent advances in terms of surgical technique, outcomes, and new robotic platforms.

Recent finding: The technological innovations in the urological field have been applied to radical prostatectomy with the aim of preserving important anatomical structures and reduce patients' morbidity and mortality. In recent years, robotic surgery contributed to resurge radical perineal prostatectomy. In 2014, the Cleveland Clinic group was the first to demonstrate the utility of a robotic approach in RPP. To date, the majority of the reported studies showed that r-RPP has noninferior perioperative, short-term oncological, and functional outcomes compared with the traditional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Given these benefits, r-RPP is a promising approach in selected patients, such as obese ones. Moreover, robotic perineal pelvic lymph node dissection performed through the same incision of r-RPP and the new Single-Port (SP) Robotic System represent further steps towards the overcoming of some intrinsic limitation of this surgical approach making this technique suitable for a larger number of patients with prostatic cancer.

Summary: Overall, r-RPP represents a reliable and effective novel surgical technique. However, more studies with long-term follow-up are needed to clarify the advantages over RARP.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. EAU Guidelines: Prostate Cancer | Uroweb [Internet]. [cited 22 august 2020]. Available at: https://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer/ . [Accessed 31 August 2020].
    1. Costello AJ. Considering the role of radical prostatectomy in 21st century prostate cancer care. Nat Rev Urol 2020; 17:177–88.
    1. Walsh PC. Radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostatic carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 1980; 7:583–591.
    1. Laydner H, Akça O, Autorino R, et al. Perineal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in the cadaver model. J Endourol 2014; 28:1479–1486.
    1. Kaouk JH, Akca O, Zargar H, et al. Descriptive technique and initial results for robotic radical perineal prostatectomy. Urology 2016; 94:129–138.