TO THE EDITOR
- PMID: 33230087
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003730
TO THE EDITOR
Comment on
-
Fragility Analysis of Statistically Significant Outcomes of Randomized Control Trials in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Feb 1;46(3):198-208. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003645. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021. PMID: 32756285
-
TO THE EDITOR.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Dec 15;45(24):E1707. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003729. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020. PMID: 33230086 No abstract available.
References
-
- Greenland S, Senn SJ, Rothman KJ, et al. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur J Epidemiol 2016; 31:337–350.
-
- Ranstam J. Why the P-value culture is bad and confidence intervals a better alternative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012; 20:805–808.
-
- Abdullah L, Davis DE, Fabricant PD, et al. Is there truly“ No Significant Difference”? Underpowered randomized controlled trials in the orthopaedic literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97:2068–2073.
-
- Sibai T, Carlisle H, Tornetta P. The darker side of randomized trials: recruitment challenges. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 suppl 1:49–55.
-
- Grabowski B. “P < 0.05” might not mean what you think: American Statistical Association Clarifies P values. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 108:djw194.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
