Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 18;39(2):215-227.
doi: 10.1017/pls.2020.22.

The roles of disgust and harm perception in political attitude moralization

Daniel C Wisneski  1 , Brittany E Hanson  2 , G Scott Morgan  3
Affiliations

The roles of disgust and harm perception in political attitude moralization

Daniel C Wisneski et al. Politics Life Sci. .

Abstract

What causes people to see their political attitudes in a moral light? One answer is that attitude moralization results from associating one's attitude stance with feelings of disgust. To test the possibility that disgust moralizes, the current study used a high-powered preregistered design looking at within-person change in moral conviction paired with an experimental manipulation of disgust or anger (versus control). Results from the preregistered analyses found that we successfully induced anger but not disgust; however, our manipulation had no effect on moral conviction. Additional exploratory analyses investigating whether emotion and harm predicted increases in moral conviction over time found that neither disgust, anger, nor sadness had an effect on moralization, whereas perceptions of harm did predict moralization. Our findings are discussed in terms of their implications for current theory and research into attitude moralization.

Keywords: Attitudes; Disgust; Harm perception; Moral conviction; Moralization.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Avramova, Y. R., & Inbar, Y. (2013). Emotion and moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1216
    1. Brandt, M. J., Wisneski, D. C., & Skitka, L. J. (2015). Moralization and the 2012 U.S. presidential election campaign. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(2), 211–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1694
    1. Chozick, A. (2016, February 7). In Flint, Hillary Clinton prods Congress and calls response to crisis “immoral.” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/08/us/politics/in-flint-hillary-clinton-...
    1. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
    1. Feinberg, M., Kovacheff, C., Teper, R., & Inbar, Y. (2019). Understanding the process of moralization: How eating meat becomes a moral issue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(1), 50–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000149