Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;30(7):956-963.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8682. Epub 2020 Nov 27.

Gender Disparity in the Funding of Diseases by the U.S. National Institutes of Health

Affiliations

Gender Disparity in the Funding of Diseases by the U.S. National Institutes of Health

Arthur A Mirin. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Gender bias has been an ongoing issue in health care, examples being underrepresentation of women in health studies, trivialization of women's physical complaints, and discrimination in the awarding of research grants. We examine here a different issue-gender disparity when it comes to the allocation of research funding among diseases. Materials and Methods: We perform an analysis of funding by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) to ascertain possible gender disparity in its allocation of funds across diseases. We normalize funding level to disease burden, as measured by the Disability Adjusted Life Year, and we specifically consider diseases for which both disease burden and funding level are provided. We apply a power-law regression analysis to model funding commensurate with disease burden. Results: We find that in nearly three-quarters of the cases where a disease afflicts primarily one gender, the funding pattern favors males, in that either the disease affects more women and is underfunded (with respect to burden), or the disease affects more men and is overfunded. Moreover, the disparity between actual funding and that which is commensurate with burden is nearly twice as large for diseases that favor males versus those that favor females. A chi-square test yields a p-value of 0.015, suggesting that our conclusions are representative of the full NIH disease portfolio. Conclusions: NIH applies a disproportionate share of its resources to diseases that affect primarily men, at the expense of those that affect primarily women.

Keywords: National Institutes of Health; gender disparity; research funding for diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
National Institutes of Health funding (2017) versus U.S. burden of disease (2015, normalized to 2017 population). The green line, produced using a power law regression analysis, represents funding commensurate with disease burden. (Figure adapted from Figure 2 of Mirin et al. Reprinted with permission from IOS Press.)

References

    1. Spencer RJ, Rice LW, Ye C, Woo K, Uppal S. Disparities in the allocation of research funding to gynecologic cancers by funding to lethality scores. Gynecol Oncol 2019;152:106–111 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences. Beyond myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: Redefining an illness, 2015. Available at: http://nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2015/ME-CFS.aspx Accessed April25, 2020 - PubMed
    1. Dimmock ME, Mirin AA, Jason LA. Estimating the disease burden of ME/CFS in the United States and its relation to research funding. J Med Ther 2016;1:1–7
    1. Mirin AA, Dimmock ME, Jason LA. Research update: The relation between ME/CFS disease burden and research funding in the United States. Work 2020;66:277–282 - PubMed
    1. Dusenbery M. Doing harm. New York: Harper Collins, 2018

LinkOut - more resources