Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 1;11(4):525-528.
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.220.

COVID-19, Trade, and Health: This Changes Everything? Comment on "What Generates Attention to Health in Trade Policy-Making? Lessons From Success in Tobacco Control and Access to Medicines: A Qualitative Study of Australia and the (Comprehensive and Progressive) Trans-Pacific Partnership"

Pepita Barlow  1
Affiliations

COVID-19, Trade, and Health: This Changes Everything? Comment on "What Generates Attention to Health in Trade Policy-Making? Lessons From Success in Tobacco Control and Access to Medicines: A Qualitative Study of Australia and the (Comprehensive and Progressive) Trans-Pacific Partnership"

Pepita Barlow. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

Townsend and colleagues highlighted the myriad political forces which fostered attention to health issues during negotiations to establish a new trans-pacific trade deal in Australia (the CP-TPP [Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership], formerly known as TPP). Among the factors they identify, exporter interests and exogenous events helped to generate attention to trade-related concerns about tobacco and access medicines, and limited attention to nutrition and alcohol. These are important considerations as the United Kingdom negotiates a trade deal with the United States in haste, whilst at the same time attempting to manage the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In this commentary, I reflect on changing attention to trade and nutrition during the COVID-19 pandemic in light of Townsend and colleagues' analysis. I explore scope for greater attention to nutrition in US-UK trade negotiations, and the challenges created by the vested interests of major UK and US processed food exporters. I further discuss the utility of the theoretical tools employed by Townsend and colleagues for wider debates in the political economy of health.

Keywords: Nutrition; Political Economy of Health; Trade Liberalisation; United Kingdom.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

  • Int J Health Policy Manag. 10:613.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Peabody JW. Economic reform and health sector policy: lessons from structural adjustment programs. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43(5):823–835. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(96)00127-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brenner MH. Political economy and health. Soc Health. 1995;1:211–246.
    1. Labonté R, Schrecker T. Globalization and social determinants of health: Introduction and methodological background (part 1 of 3) Global Health. 2007;3:5. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-3-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kentikelenis A, Karanikolos M, Papanicolas I, Basu S, McKee M, Stuckler D. Health effects of financial crisis: omens of a Greek tragedy. Lancet. 2011;378(9801):1457–1458. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61556-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barlow P. Does trade liberalization reduce child mortality in low- and middle-income countries? a synthetic control analysis of 36 policy experiments, 1963-2005. Soc Sci Med. 2018;205:107–115. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed