Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 21;20(22):6670.
doi: 10.3390/s20226670.

A Study of Accelerometer and Gyroscope Measurements in Physical Life-Log Activities Detection Systems

Affiliations

A Study of Accelerometer and Gyroscope Measurements in Physical Life-Log Activities Detection Systems

Ahmad Jalal et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Nowadays, wearable technology can enhance physical human life-log routines by shifting goals from merely counting steps to tackling significant healthcare challenges. Such wearable technology modules have presented opportunities to acquire important information about human activities in real-life environments. The purpose of this paper is to report on recent developments and to project future advances regarding wearable sensor systems for the sustainable monitoring and recording of human life-logs. On the basis of this survey, we propose a model that is designed to retrieve better information during physical activities in indoor and outdoor environments in order to improve the quality of life and to reduce risks. This model uses a fusion of both statistical and non-statistical features for the recognition of different activity patterns using wearable inertial sensors, i.e., triaxial accelerometers, gyroscopes and magnetometers. These features include signal magnitude, positive/negative peaks and position direction to explore signal orientation changes, position differentiation, temporal variation and optimal changes among coordinates. These features are processed by a genetic algorithm for the selection and classification of inertial signals to learn and recognize abnormal human movement. Our model was experimentally evaluated on four benchmark datasets: Intelligent Media Wearable Smart Home Activities (IM-WSHA), a self-annotated physical activities dataset, Wireless Sensor Data Mining (WISDM) with different sporting patterns from an IM-SB dataset and an SMotion dataset with different physical activities. Experimental results show that the proposed feature extraction strategy outperformed others, achieving an improved recognition accuracy of 81.92%, 95.37%, 90.17%, 94.58%, respectively, when IM-WSHA, WISDM, IM-SB and SMotion datasets were applied.

Keywords: accelerometer; activity detection system; healthcare; inertial sensors; reweighted genetic algorithm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow architecture of the proposed physical healthcare detection system.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Signal preprocessing for wearable accelerometers in the proposed healthcare model.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Features vectorized representation of inertial sensor stream components x, y, z.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The instantaneous vector magnitude for the walking signal pattern.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The instantaneous vector magnitude for the walking signal pattern from accelerometer sensor.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The three statistical features (mean, min, max) for practicing imitation in the “climbing upstairs” motion pattern using the Wireless Sensor Data Mining (WISDM) dataset.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Spectral Entropy for brushing hair signal pattern using the Intelligent Media-Wearable Smart Home Activities (IM-WSHA) dataset.
Figure 8
Figure 8
The empirical mode decomposition components from the inertial data.
Figure 9
Figure 9
The proposed reweighted genetic algorithm for recognizing human motion from inertial-based data.
Figure 10
Figure 10
The reweighted pattern-matching algorithm for human physical healthcare pattern understanding.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zebin T., Scully P.J., Ozanyan K.B. Evaluation of supervised classification algorithms for human activity recognition with inertial sensors; Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE SENSORS; Glasgow, UK. 29 October–1 November 2017; pp. 1–3.
    1. Hachaj T. Improving Human Motion Classification by Applying Bagging and Symmetry to PCA-Based Features. Symmetry. 2019;11:1264. doi: 10.3390/sym11101264. - DOI
    1. Susan S., Agrawal P., Mittal M., Bansal S. New shape descriptor in the context of edge continuity. CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol. 2019;4:101–109. doi: 10.1049/trit.2019.0002. - DOI
    1. Wang Y., Cang C., Yu H. A review of sensor selection, sensor devices and sensor deployment for wearable sensor-based human activity recognition systems; Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management & Applications; Chengdu, China. 15–17 December 2016; pp. 250–257.
    1. Shokri M., Tavakoli K. A review on the artificial neural network approach to analysis and prediction of seismic damage in infrastructure. Int. J. Hydromechatronics. 2019;4:178–196. doi: 10.1504/IJHM.2019.104386. - DOI