Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov 20;10(11):2161.
doi: 10.3390/ani10112161.

A Systematic Literature Review on Depopulation Methods for Swine

Affiliations
Review

A Systematic Literature Review on Depopulation Methods for Swine

Andréia G Arruda et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Swine mass depopulation refers to the destruction of large numbers of pigs and may include not only animals affected with a disease but also healthy pigs in a facility or surrounding areas. Emerging applications of mass depopulation include reducing welfare issues associated with slaughter delays, which was observed in the United States in 2020 as a result of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. The objectives of this review were to summarize the available literature on swine depopulation methods and to highlight critical gaps in knowledge. Peer-reviewed articles were identified through a systematic search in electronic databases including Web of Science, MEDLINE, and PubMed. A total of 68 publications were assessed. Gaseous carbon dioxide inhalation was the most commonly reported depopulation method for both small- and large-scale trials. Measurements of consciousness state, which serves to assess suffering and humaneness, appeared to be lacking in a high proportion of the studies. None of the published studies demonstrated an ideally reliable and safe way to induce rapid unconsciousness in large groups of pigs. Development of rapid mass depopulation methods applicable to large groups of pigs is necessary to provide industry partners with suitable and low-cost emergency preparedness procedures while adhering to personnel safety and animal welfare standards. Lastly, there is an urgent need to standardize comprehensive reporting guidelines for depopulation studies.

Keywords: emergency preparedness; swine depopulation; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of the literature searching and screening process using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist flow diagram.

References

    1. American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Guidelines for the Depopulation of Animals: 2019 Edition. [(accessed on 10 November 2020)]; Available online: https://www.avma.org/sites/default/files/resources/AVMA-Guidelines-for-t....
    1. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs Archive: Foot and Mouth Disease Outbreak Statistics. [(accessed on 10 November 2020)]; Available online: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130402162506/http://archive....
    1. Meyer R.E., Morrow W.M. Carbon dioxide for emergency on-farm euthanasia of swine. J. Swine Health Prod. 2005;13:210–217.
    1. Howden K.J., Brockhoff E.J., Caya F.D., McLeod L.J., Lavoie M., Ing J.D., Bystrom J.M., Alexandersen S., Pasick J.M., Berhane Y. An investigation into human pandemic influenza virus (H1N1) 2009 on an Alberta swine farm. Can. Vet. J. 2009;50:1153. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mangen M.-J., Burrell A., Mourits M. Epidemiological and economic modelling of classical swine fever: Application to the 1997/1998 Dutch epidemic. Agric. Syst. 2004;81:37–54. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2003.08.003. - DOI

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources