The Relationship between Coaching Behavior and Athlete Burnout: Mediating Effects of Communication and the Coach-Athlete Relationship
- PMID: 33233544
- PMCID: PMC7699703
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17228618
The Relationship between Coaching Behavior and Athlete Burnout: Mediating Effects of Communication and the Coach-Athlete Relationship
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between perceived coaching behavior (autonomy-supportive and controlling), communication, coach-athlete relationship, and athlete burnout. The study participants comprised 347 Korean active collegiate athletes from 10 sports. The results of the final model indicated that autonomy-supportive coaching was positively related to communication, whereas controlling coaching was negatively related to communication. Communication was positively related to coach-athlete relationship and was negatively related to athlete burnout. Autonomy-supportive coaching was significantly related to both the coach-athlete relationship (positively) and athlete burnout (negatively), whereas controlling coaching was only related to athlete burnout (positively). Coach-athlete relationship was negatively related to athlete burnout. Significant indirect effects were observed. The bootstrapping results indicated that the relationship between autonomy-supportive and athlete burnout was mediated by team communication and the coach-athlete relationship. The study findings enhance our current understanding of the relationships between perceived coaching behavior and athlete burnout and shed light on the important roles of team communication and the coach-athlete relationship in the relationship.
Keywords: autonomy-support; burnout; coaching behavior; coach–athlete relationship; communication; controlling.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effects of coaches' autonomy support on athletes' aggressive behavior and athlete burnout: verification of the mediating effects of coach-athlete relationship and team efficacy.Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 30;15:1388185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1388185. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39139597 Free PMC article.
-
The Relationship between Perceived Coaching Behaviors, Competitive Trait Anxiety, and Athlete Burnout: A Cross-Sectional Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 21;16(8):1424. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081424. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31010073 Free PMC article.
-
Controlling Coaching Behaviors and Athlete Burnout: Investigating the Mediating Roles of Perfectionism and Motivation.J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2016 Feb;38(1):30-44. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2015-0059. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27018556
-
The coach-athlete relationship: a motivational model.J Sports Sci. 2003 Nov;21(11):883-904. doi: 10.1080/0264041031000140374. J Sports Sci. 2003. PMID: 14626368 Review.
-
Factors influencing the relationship between coaches and athletes with disabilities: a systematic review.Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Sep 16;6:1461512. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1461512. eCollection 2024. Front Sports Act Living. 2024. PMID: 39351145 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Exploring potential mediating mechanisms between maladaptive perfectionism and athlete burnout based on multi-theory perspectives.Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 13;15:1416281. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1416281. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39346511 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Met-Expectation of Athletic Justice on Athletic Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment via Leader-Member Exchange among Elite Saudi Arabian Athletes.Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Oct 13;13(10):836. doi: 10.3390/bs13100836. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37887486 Free PMC article.
-
Mixed Method Research on Football Coaches' Competitive Behavior.Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 13;12:705557. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.705557. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34326802 Free PMC article.
-
How relationship-maintenance strategies influence athlete burnout: Mediating roles of coach-athlete relationship and basic psychological needs satisfaction.Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 9;13:1104143. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1104143. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36698612 Free PMC article.
-
The Relationship Between Athlete Perceptions of Coaching Leadership Behaviors and Athlete Grit.Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Jan 1;17(5):13-24. doi: 10.70252/KWQS8291. eCollection 2024. Int J Exerc Sci. 2024. PMID: 38665138 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Seong C.H. Dropout Motives and it’s related variables in competitive sports among Korean youth athletes. Kor. J. Sport Psychol. 2002;13:39–57.
-
- Choi H.H., Cho S.K., Eklund R.C. A comparative study of construct equivalence and latent means analysis of athlete burnout questionnaire for adolescent athletes. Kor. Soc. Wellness. 2017;12:433–445. doi: 10.21097/ksw.2017.08.12.3.433. - DOI
-
- Isoard-Gautheur S., Guillet-Descas E., Lemyre P.N. A prospective study of the influence of perceived coaching style on burnout propensity in high level young athletes: Using a self-determination theory perspective. Sport Psychol. 2012;26:282–298. doi: 10.1123/tsp.26.2.282. - DOI
-
- Davis L., Stenling A., Gustafsson H., Appleby R., Davis P. Reducing the risk of athlete burnout: Psychosocial, sociocultural, and individual considerations for coaches. Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach. 2019;14:444–452. doi: 10.1177/1747954119861076. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources