Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 20;20(22):6648.
doi: 10.3390/s20226648.

A Study of the Radiation Tolerance of CVD Diamond to 70 MeV Protons, Fast Neutrons and 200 MeV Pions

Lukas Bäni  1 Andreas Alexopoulos  2 Marina Artuso  3 Felix Bachmair  1 Marcin Ryszard Bartosik  2 Helge Christoph Beck  4 Vincenzo Bellini  5 Vladimir Belyaev  6 Benjamin Bentele  7 Alexandre Bes  8 Jean-Marie Brom  9 Gabriele Chiodini  10 Dominik Chren  11 Vladimir Cindro  12 Gilles Claus  9 Johann Collot  8 John Cumalat  7 Sébastien Curtoni  8 Anne Evelyn Dabrowski  2 Raffaello D'Alessandro  13 Denis Dauvergne  8 Wim De Boer  14 Christian Dorfer  1 Marc Dünser  2 Gerald Eigen  15 Vladimir Eremin  16 Jacopo Forneris  17 Laurent Gallin-Martel  8 Marie-Laure Gallin-Martel  8 Kock Kiam Gan  18 Martin Gastal  2 Abderrahman Ghimouz  8 Mathieu Goffe  9 Joel Goldstein  19 Alexander Golubev  20 Andrej Gorišek  12 Eugene Grigoriev  20 Jörn Grosse-Knetter  4 Aidan Grummer  21 Bojan Hiti  12 Dmitry Hits  1 Martin Hoeferkamp  21 Jérôme Hosselet  9 Fabian Hügging  22 Chris Hutson  19 Jens Janssen  22 Harris Kagan  18 Keida Kanxheri  23 Richard Kass  18 Mladen Kis  24 Gregor Kramberger  12 Sergey Kuleshov  20 Ana Lacoste  8 Stefano Lagomarsino  13 Alessandro Lo Giudice  17 Ivan López Paz  25 Eric Lukosi  26 Chaker Maazouzi  9 Igor Mandić  12 Sara Marcatili  8 Alysia Marino  7 Cédric Mathieu  9 Mauro Menichelli  23 Marko Mikuž  12 Arianna Morozzi  23 Francesco Moscatelli  23 Joshua Moss  27 Raymond Mountain  3 Alexander Oh  25 Paolo Olivero  17 Daniele Passeri  23 Heinz Pernegger  2 Roberto Perrino  10 Federico Picollo  17 Michal Pomorski  28 Renato Potenza  5 Arnulf Quadt  4 Fatah Rarbi  8 Alessandro Re  17 Michael Reichmann  1 Shaun Roe  2 Olivier Rossetto  8 Diego Alejandro Sanz Becerra  1 Christian J Schmidt  24 Stephen Schnetzer  29 Silvio Sciortino  13 Andrea Scorzoni  23 Sally Seidel  21 Leonello Servoli  23 Dale Shane Smith  18 Bruno Sopko  11 Vit Sopko  11 Stefania Spagnolo  10 Stefan Spanier  26 Kevin Stenson  7 Robert Stone  29 Bjarne Stugu  15 Concetta Sutera  5 Michael Traeger  24 William Trischuk  30 Marco Truccato  17 Cristina Tuvè  5 Jaap Velthuis  19 Stephen Wagner  7 Rainer Wallny  1 Jianchun Wang  3 Norbert Wermes  22 Jayashani Wickramasinghe  21 Mahfoud Yamouni  8 Justas Zalieckas  15 Marko Zavrtanik  12 Kazuhiko Hara  31 Yoichi Ikegami  32 Osamu Jinnouchi  33 Takashi Kohriki  32 Shingo Mitsui  31 Ryo Nagai  33 Susumu Terada  32 Yoshinobu Unno  32
Affiliations

A Study of the Radiation Tolerance of CVD Diamond to 70 MeV Protons, Fast Neutrons and 200 MeV Pions

Lukas Bäni et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

We measured the radiation tolerance of commercially available diamonds grown by the Chemical Vapor Deposition process by measuring the charge created by a 120 GeV hadron beam in a 50 μm pitch strip detector fabricated on each diamond sample before and after irradiation. We irradiated one group of samples with 70 MeV protons, a second group of samples with fast reactor neutrons (defined as energy greater than 0.1 MeV), and a third group of samples with 200 MeV pions, in steps, to (8.8±0.9) × 1015 protons/cm2, (1.43±0.14) × 1016 neutrons/cm2, and (6.5±1.4) × 1014 pions/cm2, respectively. By observing the charge induced due to the separation of electron-hole pairs created by the passage of the hadron beam through each sample, on an event-by-event basis, as a function of irradiation fluence, we conclude all datasets can be described by a first-order damage equation and independently calculate the damage constant for 70 MeV protons, fast reactor neutrons, and 200 MeV pions. We find the damage constant for diamond irradiated with 70 MeV protons to be 1.62±0.07(stat)±0.16(syst)× 10-18 cm2/(p μm), the damage constant for diamond irradiated with fast reactor neutrons to be 2.65±0.13(stat)±0.18(syst)× 10-18 cm2/(n μm), and the damage constant for diamond irradiated with 200 MeV pions to be 2.0±0.2(stat)±0.5(syst)× 10-18 cm2/(π μm). The damage constants from this measurement were analyzed together with our previously published 24 GeV proton irradiation and 800 MeV proton irradiation damage constant data to derive the first comprehensive set of relative damage constants for Chemical Vapor Deposition diamond. We find 70 MeV protons are 2.60 ± 0.29 times more damaging than 24 GeV protons, fast reactor neutrons are 4.3 ± 0.4 times more damaging than 24 GeV protons, and 200 MeV pions are 3.2 ± 0.8 more damaging than 24 GeV protons. We also observe the measured data can be described by a universal damage curve for all proton, neutron, and pion irradiations we performed of Chemical Vapor Deposition diamond. Finally, we confirm the spatial uniformity of the collected charge increases with fluence for polycrystalline Chemical Vapor Deposition diamond, and this effect can also be described by a universal curve.

Keywords: Chemical Vapor Deposition; charge collection distance; mean drift path; polycrystalline diamond; radiation damage constant; radiation tolerance; schubweg; single-crystalline diamond.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Lethargy neutron spectrum of channel F19 in Core 189 of the JSI TRIGA reactor used for all our neutron irradiations, at full reactor power (250 kW) [12].
Figure 2
Figure 2
The signal charge spectrum evolution for samples irradiated with 70 MeV protons biased at E = +2 V/μm. The pulse height spectrum before irradiation was measured using a setup with a 90Sr β-source and a single pad metallization on the diamond. The integral of each spectrum has been normalized to unity.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The signal charge spectrum evolution for samples irradiated with fast neutrons biased at E = 2 V/μm. The pulse height spectrum before irradiation was measured using a setup with a 90Sr β-source and a single pad metallization on the diamond. The integral of each spectrum was normalized to unity.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The signal charge spectrum evolution for the scCVD diamond sample irradiated with 200 MeV pions biased at E = +2 V/μm. The pulse height spectrum before irradiation was measured using a setup with a 90Sr β-source and a single pad metallization on the diamond, biased at 1 V/μm, since the detector collects all the charge at a bias voltage of 200 V. The integral of each spectrum was normalized to unity.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The 1/λ for pCVD diamond in the 70 MeV proton irradiation. The two values shown at each fluence are the values for positive (solid markers) and negative (open markers) bias at E= ±2 V/μm. The data were fit with a first-order damage curve independently for each sample.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The 1/λ for pCVD diamond in the fast neutron irradiation. The two values shown at each fluence are the values for positive (solid markers) and negative (open markers) bias at E= ±2 V/μm. The data were fit with a first-order damage curve independently for each sample.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The 1/λ for scCVD and pCVD diamond in the pion irradiation. The two values shown at each fluence are the values for positive (solid markers) and negative (open markers) bias at E= ±2 V/μm. The data were fit with a simple damage curve independently for each diamond type. The uncertainty for unirradiated scCVD diamond comes from not knowing the upper initial mean drift distance exactly.
Figure 8
Figure 8
The 1/λ for scCVD (solid markers) and pCVD (open markers) diamond. As reference, the 800 MeV proton and 24 GeV proton data from [4] are plotted. Each point is shifted by 1/λ0,j. The dotted box indicates the zoom area shown in Figure 9.
Figure 9
Figure 9
The 1/λ for scCVD (solid markers) and pCVD (open markers) diamond up to a fluence of 7 × 1015/cm2 (zoom of dotted box in Figure 8). As reference, the 800 MeV proton and 24 GeV proton data from [4] are plotted. Each point is shifted by 1/λ0,j.
Figure 10
Figure 10
The 1/λ for scCVD (solid markers) and pCVD (open markers) diamond. Each point is shifted by 1/λ0,j. The fluence of each point was scaled by the relative damage constant, κi, to the 24 GeV proton equivalent fluence. The damage model (dashed line) is fitted to the data points.
Figure 11
Figure 11
The λ for scCVD (solid markers) and pCVD (open markers) diamond. The fluence of each point was scaled by the relative damage constant to the 24 GeV proton equivalent fluence. Each point is shifted by ϕ0,j which represents the starting value of sample j in 24 GeV proton equivalent fluence space. The dashed line is the fit of the damage model in Equation (3) to the data points. The gray band indicates the variation of the fit parameters by one standard deviation.
Figure 12
Figure 12
The FWHM/MP as a function of fluence in the 70 MeV proton irradiation measured in a +120 GeV/c hadron beam at CERN. The two values shown at each fluence are the values for positive (solid markers) and negative bias (open markers) at E=2 V/μm.
Figure 13
Figure 13
The FWHM/MP as a function of fluence in the fast neutron irradiation measured in a +120 GeV/c hadron beam at CERN. The two values shown at each fluence are the values for positive (solid markers) and negative bias (open markers) at E=2 V/μm.
Figure 14
Figure 14
The FWHM/MP as a function of fluence in the pion irradiation measured in a +120 GeV/c hadron beam at CERN. The two values shown at each fluence are the values for positive (solid markers) and negative bias (open markers) at E=2 V/μm.
Figure 15
Figure 15
The FWHM/MP for scCVD (solid markers) and pCVD (open markers) diamond. The fluence of each point was scaled by the relative damage constant to the 24 GeV proton equivalent fluence.
Figure 16
Figure 16
The FWHM/MP of scCVD and pCVD diamond samples irradiated with 24 GeV protons, 800 MeV protons, 70 MeV protons, fast reactor neutron, and 200 MeV pions for positive (solid markers) and negative bias (open markers) at E=2 V/μm. The fluence of each point was scaled by the relative damage constant to the 24 GeV proton equivalent fluence. The dashed line represents a constant fit to the scCVD diamond data points (blue) extrapolated to 40 × 1015 p/cm2 for illustrative purposes.
Figure 17
Figure 17
The 1/λ for CVD diamond and silicon for proton, neutron and pion irradiations at an electric field of 2 V/μm. The charge collection was measured at room temperature. The dashed lines are diamond results from this work and those in [4] for irradiations at 24 GeV protons (blue), 800 MeV protons (red), 70 MeV protons (green), fast neutrons (orange), and 200 MeV pions (purple), and the solid lines are the silicon damage data from RD50 [28] for proton (blue and red), neutron (orange), and pion (purple) irradiations. The curves for irradiations with 25 MeV protons were taken from [24].

References

    1. CERN The European Organization for Nuclear Research, CH-1211, Genève 23, Switzerland. [(accessed on 11 November 2020)]; Available online: https://home.cern/
    1. Apollinari G., Brüning O., Nakamoto T., Lucio R. High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Preliminary Design Report, Chapter 1: High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider HL-LHC. CERN; Geneva, Switzerland: 2015. CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, CERN-2015-005. - DOI
    1. Apollinari G., Béjar A.I., Brüning O., Fessia P., Lamont M., Rossi L., Tavian L. High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Technical Design Report V.0.1. CERN; Geneva, Switzerland: 2017. CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, Volume 4/2017 CERN-2017-007-M. - DOI
    1. Bäni L., Alexopoulos A., Artuso M., Bachmair F., Bartosik M., Beck H., Bellini V., Belyaev V., Bentele B., Bes A., et al. ((On behalf of the RD42 Collaboration)). A study of the radiation tolerance of poly-crystalline and single-crystalline CVD diamond to 800 MeV and 24 GeV protons. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2019;52:465103. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab37c6. - DOI
    1. The Samples Used in this Study Were Electronic Grade CVD Diamond Purchased from Element Six Technologies, Global Innovation Centre, Fermi Ave., Harwell, OX11 0QR, United Kingdom and II-VI Incorporated, 375 Saxonburg Blvd., Saxonburg, PA 16056-9499, USA. [(accessed on 11 November 2020)]; Available online: http://www.iiviinfrared.com.