A comparative case study of prescribing and non-prescribing physiotherapists and podiatrists
- PMID: 33234141
- PMCID: PMC7687831
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05918-8
A comparative case study of prescribing and non-prescribing physiotherapists and podiatrists
Abstract
Background: Increasing numbers of nurses, pharmacists and allied health professionals across the world have prescribing rights for medicines: over 90,000 of the eligible United Kingdom workforce are qualified as non-doctor prescribers. In order to inform future developments, it is important to understand the benefits and impact of prescribing by allied health professionals including physiotherapists and podiatrists.
Aim: to compare outcomes of physiotherapist and podiatrist Independent Prescriber (PP- IP) patients with those of physiotherapist and podiatrist non-prescribers (PP-NPs). Outcome measures included patient satisfaction, ease of access to services, quality of life and cost implications.
Design: a mixed method comparative case study.
Methods: Using mixed methods of data collection, outcomes were compared between 7 sites where care was provided from a PP-IP (3 podiatrist and 4 physiotherapist IPs) and 7 sites from a PP-NP (3 podiatrist and 4 physiotherapist NPs). Patients were followed up for 2 months (2015-2016).
Results: 489 patients were recruited: n = 243 IP sites, and n = 246 NP sites. Independent prescribing was found to be highly acceptable, and equivalent in terms of quality of life (p > 0.05) and patient satisfaction (p ≤ 0.05) compared to care provided by NPs. PP-IP care delivery was found to be more resource intensive than PP-NP, with longer consultation duration for IPs (around 6.5 mins), and a higher proportion of physiotherapy patients discussed with medical colleagues (around 9.5 min).
Conclusion: This study provides new knowledge that PP-IPs provide high levels of care. PP-IP care delivery was found to be more resource intensive. Further research is required to explore cost effectiveness. A more focussed exploration within each profession using targeted outcome measures would enable a more robust comparison, inform future developments around the world and help ensure non-doctor prescribing is recognised as an effective way to alleviate shortfalls in the global workforce.
Keywords: Comparative case study; Independent prescribing; Physiotherapy; Podiatry.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
A decade of independent prescribing in the UK: a review of progress.J Foot Ankle Res. 2022 May 11;15(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13047-022-00541-8. J Foot Ankle Res. 2022. PMID: 35546680 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Independent prescribing in primary care: A survey of patients', prescribers' and colleagues' perceptions and experiences.Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jul;27(4):e459-e470. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12746. Epub 2019 Mar 18. Health Soc Care Community. 2019. PMID: 30884013
-
Independent prescribing in the UK: insights from the Department of Health Allied Health Professions Medicines Project team.J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Jul 4;16(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00641-z. J Foot Ankle Res. 2023. PMID: 37400869 Free PMC article.
-
Medicines management activity with physiotherapy and podiatry: A systematic mixed studies review.Health Policy. 2018 Dec;122(12):1333-1339. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 10. Health Policy. 2018. PMID: 30337160
-
Perceptions about the implementation of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia: a national survey of Australian physiotherapists.BMJ Open. 2019 May 19;9(5):e024991. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024991. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31110086 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Contested role boundaries and professional title: Implications of the independent review of podiatric surgery in Australia.J Foot Ankle Res. 2024 Dec;17(4):e70007. doi: 10.1002/jfa2.70007. J Foot Ankle Res. 2024. PMID: 39425264 Free PMC article.
-
A decade of independent prescribing in the UK: a review of progress.J Foot Ankle Res. 2022 May 11;15(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13047-022-00541-8. J Foot Ankle Res. 2022. PMID: 35546680 Free PMC article. Review.
-
South African physiotherapists' attitudes to medicine prescription as an extension of practice.S Afr J Physiother. 2023 Jun 23;79(1):1851. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1851. eCollection 2023. S Afr J Physiother. 2023. PMID: 37415856 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of non-medical independent prescribing in primary care in the UK: a qualitative systematic review.BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 8;12(6):e052227. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052227. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35676011 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the macro-level, meso-level and micro-level barriers and facilitators to the provision of good quality early inflammatory arthritis (EIA) care in England and Wales.RMD Open. 2021 Aug;7(3):e001616. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001616. RMD Open. 2021. PMID: 34400579 Free PMC article.
References
-
- GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1211–1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- OECD . Health at a Glance 2019 OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019.
-
- World Health Organisation. The World Medicines Situation Report. https://www.whoint/medicines/areas/policy/world_medicines_situation/en/ accessed 15th August 2019. 2011.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Therapeutic Drug Use. https://www.cdcgov/nchs/fastats/drug-use-therapeutichtm accessed 15th August 2019. 2017.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous