T-piece versus pressure-support ventilation for spontaneous breathing trials before extubation in patients at high risk of reintubation: protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (TIP-EX)
- PMID: 33234658
- PMCID: PMC7689072
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042619
T-piece versus pressure-support ventilation for spontaneous breathing trials before extubation in patients at high risk of reintubation: protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (TIP-EX)
Abstract
Introduction: In intensive care unit (ICU), the decision of extubation is a critical time because mortality is particularly high in case of reintubation. To reduce that risk, guidelines recommend to systematically perform a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) before extubation in order to mimic the postextubation physiological conditions. SBT is usually performed with a T-piece disconnecting the patient from the ventilator or with low levels of pressure-support ventilation (PSV). However, work of breathing is lower during PSV than during T-piece. Consequently, while PSV trial may hasten extubation, it may also increase the risk of reintubation. We hypothesise that, compared with T-piece, SBT performed using PSV may hasten extubation without increasing the risk of reintubation.
Methods and analysis: This study is an investigator-initiated, multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing T-piece vs PSV for SBTs in patients at high risk of reintubation in ICUs. Nine hundred patients will be randomised with a 1:1 ratio in two groups according to the type of SBT. The primary outcome is the number of ventilator-free days at day 28, defined as the number of days alive and without invasive mechanical ventilation between the initial SBT (day 1) and day 28. Secondary outcomes include the number of days between the initial SBT and the first extubation attempt, weaning difficulty, the number of patients extubated after the initial SBT and not reintubated within the following 72 hours, the number of patients extubated within the 7 days following the initial SBT, the number of patients reintubated within the 7 days following extubation, in-ICU length of stay and mortality in ICU, at day 28 and at day 90.
Ethics and dissemination: The study has been approved by the central ethics committee 'Ile de France V' (2019-A02151-56) and patients will be included after informed consent. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.
Trial registration number: NCT04227639.
Keywords: adult intensive & critical care; respiratory medicine (see thoracic medicine); respiratory physiology.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: AWT reports financial support (payment for lectures and travel expenses coverage to attend scientific meetings) by Fisher & Paykel, Covidien, Maquet—Getinge, GE Healthcare. J-PF reports consulting fees from Fisher & Paykel and SOS oxygène.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Pressure-Support Ventilation vs T-Piece During Spontaneous Breathing Trials Before Extubation Among Patients at High Risk of Extubation Failure: A Post-Hoc Analysis of a Clinical Trial.Chest. 2020 Oct;158(4):1446-1455. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.053. Epub 2020 May 19. Chest. 2020. PMID: 32439503 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison between pressure support ventilation and T-piece in spontaneous breathing trials.Respir Res. 2022 Feb 7;23(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-01942-w. Respir Res. 2022. PMID: 35130914 Free PMC article.
-
Spontaneous-Breathing Trials with Pressure-Support Ventilation or a T-Piece.N Engl J Med. 2022 Nov 17;387(20):1843-1854. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2209041. Epub 2022 Oct 26. N Engl J Med. 2022. PMID: 36286317 Clinical Trial.
-
Spontaneous breathing trials: how and for how long?Curr Opin Crit Care. 2025 Feb 1;31(1):86-92. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001227. Epub 2024 Oct 23. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2025. PMID: 39445601 Review.
-
Comparison of T-piece and pressure support ventilation as spontaneous breathing trials in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crit Care. 2020 Feb 26;24(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2764-3. Crit Care. 2020. PMID: 32102693 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
To Wean or Not to Wean: A Practical Patient Focused Guide to Ventilator Weaning.J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Nov;37(11):1417-1425. doi: 10.1177/08850666221095436. Epub 2022 Jul 11. J Intensive Care Med. 2022. PMID: 35815895 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Weaning critically ill patients from mechanical ventilation: a protocol from a multicenter retrospective cohort study.J Thorac Dis. 2022 Jan;14(1):199-206. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-1217. J Thorac Dis. 2022. PMID: 35242382 Free PMC article.
-
Defining predictors for successful mechanical ventilation weaning, using a data-mining process and artificial intelligence.Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 22;13(1):20483. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47452-7. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37993526 Free PMC article.
-
Automatic continuous P0.1 measurements during weaning from mechanical ventilation: a clinical study.Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Apr 1;15(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01455-x. Ann Intensive Care. 2025. PMID: 40167952 Free PMC article.
-
Weaning management in a patient with heart dysfunction: a case report.Front Physiol. 2025 Jun 2;16:1609975. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1609975. eCollection 2025. Front Physiol. 2025. PMID: 40529991 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Schmidt GA, Girard TD, Kress JP, et al. . Official executive summary of an American thoracic Society/American College of chest physicians clinical practice guideline: liberation from mechanical ventilation in critically ill adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;195:115–9. 10.1164/rccm.201610-2076ST - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical