Outcome Quality Beyond the Mean - An Analysis of 43,231 Pancreatic Surgical Procedures Related to Hospital Volume
- PMID: 33234781
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004315
Outcome Quality Beyond the Mean - An Analysis of 43,231 Pancreatic Surgical Procedures Related to Hospital Volume
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to examine whether elevated in-hospital mortality rates in lower volume hospitals are only valid on average or also apply for individual hospitals.
Summary of background data: Various studies demonstrated a volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery with increased mortality in low volume hospitals. However, almost all studies assessed quality indicators only for groups of hospitals by averaged measures, neglecting variability of hospital performance.
Methods: The German nationwide hospital discharge data (diagnosis-related groups-statistics) was used to determine risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality for all distal pancreatectomies (DP), pancreatoduodenectomies (Whipple-proce-dure, PD), and pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomies (PPD) performed between 2011 and 2015. Hospitals were stratified according to annual and 5-year total procedure volume and examined in relation to average in-hospital mortality of the highest volume quintile.
Results: Lowest adjusted mortality rates were observed in highest volume quintiles for each pancreatic resection procedure, with 6.2% for DP, 8.3% for PD, and 5.7% for PPD in the 5-year observation period. With these mortality rates as reference values the analysis revealed that a non-negligible proportion of hospitals performed equal or better (DP: 430/784, 54.5%; PD: 269/611, 44.0%; PPD: 255/565, 45.1%) than the hospitals of the highest volume quintile.
Conclusions: High quality of care, with in-hospital mortality rates less or equal to high-volume hospitals, is also achieved in hospitals with lesser procedure volume. Therefore, mere volume seems not suitable as proximal measure for assessing individual hospital quality. instead, more sophisticated certification systems, that allow accurate quality assessment and better reflect clinical variability, should preferred to fixed minimum volume thresholds.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med 1979; 301:1364–1369.
-
- Alsfasser G, Leicht H, Gunster C, et al. Volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 2016; 103:136–143.
-
- Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. NEngl J Med 2002; 346:1128–1137.
-
- Gastinger I, Meyer F, Shardin A, et al. Investigations on in-hospital mortality in pancreatic surgery: results of a multicenter observational study. Chirurg 2019; 90:47–55.
-
- Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Wouters MW, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 2011; 98:485–494.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
