Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 24;10(1):20478.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77500-5.

Species, sex and geographic variation in chlamydial prevalence in abundant wild Australian parrots

Affiliations

Species, sex and geographic variation in chlamydial prevalence in abundant wild Australian parrots

Helena S Stokes et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Chlamydia psittaci (order: Chlamydiales) is a globally distributed zoonotic bacterium that can cause potentially fatal disease in birds and humans. Parrots are a major host, yet prevalence and risk factors for infection in wild parrots are largely unknown. Additionally, recent research suggests there is a diverse range of novel Chlamydiales circulating in wildlife. We therefore sampled seven abundant parrot species in south-eastern Australia, taking cloacal swabs and serum from n = 132 wild adults. We determined C. psittaci and Chlamydiales prevalence and seroprevalence, and tested for host species, sex, geographical and seasonal differences, and temporal changes in individual infection status. Across all species, Chlamydiales prevalence was 39.8% (95% CI 31.6, 48.7), C. psittaci prevalence was 9.8% (95% CI 5.7, 16.3) and C. gallinacea prevalence was 0.8% (95% CI 0.1, 4.5). Other Chlamydiales species were not identified to species level. We identified two C. psittaci strains within the 6BC clade, which is highly virulent in humans. Seroprevalence was 37.0% (95% CI 28.5, 46.4). Host species (including crimson rosellas, galahs, sulphur-crested cockatoos and blue-winged parrots) differed in seroprevalence and Chlamydiales prevalence. Galahs had both highest Chlamydiales prevalence (54.8%) and seroprevalence (74.1%). Seroprevalence differed between sites, with a larger difference in males (range 20-63%) than females (29-44%). We reveal a higher chlamydial prevalence than previously reported in many wild parrots, with implications for potential reservoirs, and transmission risks to humans and other avian hosts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of prevalence and seroprevalence across host species: (a) Chlamydiales and C. psittaci PCR prevalence, and (b) seroprevalence. *denotes significant pairwise comparisons between species (where p < 0.05). Data labels indicate the sample size for each species.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of prevalence and seroprevalence between field sites (Meredith and Bellbrae): (a) Chlamydiales and C. psittaci PCR prevalence; (b) seroprevalence; (c) seroprevalence for each species caught at both sites; and (d) seroprevalence for each sex. *denotes significance (p < 0.05). Data labels indicate the sample size for each group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cleaveland S, Laurenson MK, Taylor LH. Diseases of humans and their domestic mammals: pathogen characteristics, host range and the risk of emergence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2001;356:991–999. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0889. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cunningham AA, Daszak P, Wood JLN. One health, emerging infectious diseases and wildlife: two decades of progress? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2017 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0167. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grogan LF, et al. Surveillance for emerging biodiversity diseases of wildlife. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004015. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Artois M, et al. In: Management of Disease in Wild Mammals. Delahay RJ, Smith GC, Hutchings MR, et al., editors. Berlin: Springer; 2009. pp. 187–214.
    1. Ryser-Degiorgis M. Wildlife health investigations: needs, challenges and recommendations. BMC Vet. Res. 2013;9:223. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-223. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types