Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 19;46(2):189-196.
doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa096.

Topical Review: Crowdsourcing as a Novel Approach to Qualitative Research

Erica Sood  1   2   3   4 , Tim Wysocki  1 , Melissa A Alderfer  1   4 , Karen Aroian  5 , Jennifer Christofferson  1 , Allison Karpyn  6 , Anne E Kazak  1   4 , Jessica Pierce  1   7   8
Affiliations

Topical Review: Crowdsourcing as a Novel Approach to Qualitative Research

Erica Sood et al. J Pediatr Psychol. .

Abstract

Objective: To describe a novel, five-phase approach to collecting qualitative data from hard-to-reach populations using crowdsourcing methods.

Methods: Drawing from experiences across recent studies with type 1 diabetes and congenital heart disease stakeholders, we describe five phases of crowdsourcing methodology, an innovative approach to conducting qualitative research within an online environment, and discuss relevant practical and ethical issues.

Results: Phases of crowdsourcing methodology are: (I) Preparing; (II) Forming Crowds; (III) Collecting Crowdsourced Data; (IV) Coding and Analyzing Crowdsourced Data; and (V) Generating and Disseminating Findings. Iterative feedback from stakeholders is obtained in all five phases. Practical and ethical issues include accessing diverse stakeholders, emotional engagement of crowd participants, responsiveness and transparency of crowdsourcing methodology, and limited personal contact with crowd participants.

Conclusions: Crowdsourcing is an innovative, efficient, feasible, and timely approach to engaging hard-to-reach populations in qualitative research.

Keywords: cardiology; chronic illness; diabetes; mental health; parent stress; psychosocial functioning; qualitative methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Phases of crowdsourcing methodology with key tasks.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Crowdsourcing platform: sample responses and assigned codes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alderfer M., Sood E. (2016). Using qualitative research methods to improve clinical care in pediatric psychology. Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology, 4(4), 358–361. 10.1037/cpp0000164 - DOI
    1. Brabham D. C. (2013). Crowdsourcing. MIT Press Essential Knowledge Series. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
    1. Brabham D., Ribisl K., Kirchner T., Bernhardt J. (2014). Crowdsourcing applications for public health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46(2), 179–187. 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Créquit P., Mansouri G., Benchoufi M., Vivot A., Ravaud P. (2018). Mapping of crowdsourcing in health: Systematic review (2018). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(5), e187.10.2196/jmir.9330 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cushing C., Fedele D., Brannon E., Kichline T. (2018). Parents’ perspectives on the theoretical domains framework elements needed in a pediatric health behavior app: A crowdsourced social validity study. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth, 6(12), e192.10.2196/mhealth.9808 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types