Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 27;69(47):1762-1766.
doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6947a2.

Decline in SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies After Mild Infection Among Frontline Health Care Personnel in a Multistate Hospital Network - 12 States, April-August 2020

Collaborators, Affiliations

Decline in SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies After Mild Infection Among Frontline Health Care Personnel in a Multistate Hospital Network - 12 States, April-August 2020

Wesley H Self et al. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. .

Abstract

Most persons infected with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), develop virus-specific antibodies within several weeks, but antibody titers might decline over time. Understanding the timeline of antibody decline is important for interpreting SARS-CoV-2 serology results. Serum specimens were collected from a convenience sample of frontline health care personnel at 13 hospitals and tested for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 during April 3-June 19, 2020, and again approximately 60 days later to assess this timeline. The percentage of participants who experienced seroreversion, defined as an antibody signal-to-threshold ratio >1.0 at baseline and <1.0 at the follow-up visit, was assessed. Overall, 194 (6.0%) of 3,248 participants had detectable antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 at baseline (1). Upon repeat testing approximately 60 days later (range = 50-91 days), 146 (93.6%) of 156 participants experienced a decline in antibody response indicated by a lower signal-to-threshold ratio at the follow-up visit, compared with the baseline visit, and 44 (28.2%) experienced seroreversion. Participants with higher initial antibody responses were more likely to have antibodies detected at the follow-up test than were those who had a lower initial antibody response. Whether decay in these antibodies increases risk for reinfection and disease remains unanswered. However, these results suggest that serology testing at a single time point is likely to underestimate the number of persons with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and a negative serologic test result might not reliably exclude prior infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Christopher J. Lindsell reports grants from National Institutes of Health, grants from Department of Defense, Marcus Foundation, Endpoint Health, Entegrion, bioMerieux, and Bioscape Digital, outside the submitted work. Daniel J. Henning reports personal fees from CytoVale and grants from Baxter, outside the submitted work. Akram Khan reports grants from United Therapeutics, Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron, and Reata Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. Samuel M. Brown reports grants from National Institutes of Health, Department of Defense, Intermountain Research and Medical Foundation, and Janssen; consulting fees paid to his employer from Faron and Sedana, all outside the submitted work. Ithan D. Peltan reports grants from the National Institutes of Health and, outside the submitted work, grants from Asahi Kasei Pharma, Immunexpress Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Regeneron. Carlos Grijalva reports other from Pfizer, other from Merck, other from Sanofi-Pasteur, grants from Campbell Alliance, the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration, the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, outside the submitted work. Todd W. Rice reports consulting work for Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, Inc, outside the submitted work. H. Keipp Talbot has served on a data safety and monitoring board for Seqirus. Natasha Halasa receives grant support from Quidel and Sanofi, donation of vaccines and hemagglutination inhibition/microneutralization titers performed by Sanofi, and speaker fees by an educational grant supported by Genentech, outside the submitted work. No other potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Figures

FIGURE
FIGURE
Percentage of 156 participants with SARS-COV-2 antibodies at baseline who seroreverted approximately 60 days later, by baseline antibody response and history of COVID-19–compatible symptoms before baseline testing — 13 academic medical centers, United States, 2020 Abbreviations: COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019; ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. * Antibody response was categorized as high or low based on signal-to-threshold ratio of panimmunoglobulin reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 full length S protein ELISA at baseline visit Signs and symptoms included one or more of the following reported between February 1, 2020, and the date of baseline study visit: fever (temperature >99.5°F [37.5°C]), cough, shortness of breath, myalgias, sore throat, vomiting, diarrhea, change in or loss of taste or smell, and chest tightness.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection among Healthcare Workers of a German COVID-19 Treatment Center.
    Larribère L, Gordejeva J, Kuhnhenn L, Kurscheidt M, Pobiruchin M, Vladimirova D, Martin M, Roser M, Schramm W, Martens UM, Eigenbrod T. Larribère L, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 1;18(13):7057. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137057. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34281000 Free PMC article.
  • Anti-Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Immunoglobulin G Antibody Seroprevalence Among Truck Drivers and Assistants in Kenya.
    Kagucia EW, Gitonga JN, Kalu C, Ochomo E, Ochieng B, Kuya N, Karani A, Nyagwange J, Karia B, Mugo D, Karanja HK, Tuju J, Mutiso A, Maroko H, Okubi L, Maitha E, Ajuck H, Mukabi D, Moracha W, Bulimu D, Andanje N, Aman R, Mwangangi M, Amoth P, Kasera K, Ng'ang'a W, Nyaguara A, Voller S, Otiende M, Bottomley C, Agoti CN, Ochola-Oyier LI, Adetifa IMO, Etyang AO, Gallagher KE, Uyoga S, Barasa E, Bejon P, Tsofa B, Agweyu A, Warimwe GM, Scott JAG; Magarini Sub-County TDA SARS-CoV-2 Serosurveillance Team, The Busia County TDA SARS-CoV-2 Serosurveillance Team. Kagucia EW, et al. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 12;8(7):ofab314. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab314. eCollection 2021 Jul. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 34660838 Free PMC article.
  • Benchmarking SARS CoV-2 Infection in the Workplace to Support Continuity of Operations.
    Iddins BO, Waugh MH, Buck B, Cato T, Graham DE, Attia K, Jones D, Partin A, Shourbaji R, Wesh C. Iddins BO, et al. J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Jul 1;63(7):548-556. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002188. J Occup Environ Med. 2021. PMID: 33741830 Free PMC article.
  • Policies on children and schools during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Western Europe.
    Soriano-Arandes A, Brett A, Buonsenso D, Emilsson L, de la Fuente Garcia I, Gkentzi D, Helve O, Kepp KP, Mossberg M, Muka T, Munro A, Papan C, Perramon-Malavez A, Schaltz-Buchholzer F, Smeesters PR, Zimmermann P. Soriano-Arandes A, et al. Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 25;11:1175444. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1175444. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37564427 Free PMC article. Review.
  • A retrospective study suggests 55 days of persistence of SARS-CoV-2 during the first wave of the pandemic in Santiago de Chile.
    Acuña-Castillo C, Vidal M, Vallejos-Vidal E, Luraschi R, Barrera-Avalos C, Inostroza-Molina A, Molina-Cabrera S, Valdes D, Schafer C, Maisey K, Imarai M, Vera R, Vargas S, Rojo LE, Leiva-Salcedo E, Escobar A, Reyes-Cerpa S, Gaete A, Palma-Vejares R, Travisany D, Torres C, Reyes-López FE, Sandino AM. Acuña-Castillo C, et al. Heliyon. 2024 Jan 18;10(7):e24419. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24419. eCollection 2024 Apr 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38601544 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Self WH, Tenforde MW, Stubblefield WB, et al.; CDC COVID-19 Response Team; IVY Network. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among frontline health care personnel in a multistate hospital network—13 academic medical centers, April–June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:1221–6. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6935e2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao J, Yuan Q, Wang H, et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients of novel coronavirus disease 2019. Clin Infect Dis 2020;ciaa344. 10.1093/cid/ciaa344 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Long QX, Liu BZ, Deng HJ, et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19. Nat Med 2020;26:845–8. 10.1038/s41591-020-0897-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Havers FP, Reed C, Lim T, et al. Seroprevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in 10 sites in the United States, March 23–May 12, 2020. JAMA Intern Med 2020.. Epub July 21, 2020. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4130 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stringhini S, Wisniak A, Piumatti G, et al. Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in Geneva, Switzerland (SEROCoV-POP): a population-based study. Lancet 2020;396:313–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31304-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances