Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec;27(2_suppl):12-18.
doi: 10.1177/2047487320962990.

Comparison among different multiparametric scores for risk stratification in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction

Affiliations
Review

Comparison among different multiparametric scores for risk stratification in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction

Ugo Corrà et al. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Heart failure is a serious condition with high prevalence (about 2% in the adult population in developed countries, and more than 8% in patients older than 75 years). About 3-5% of hospital admissions are linked with heart failure incidents. The guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure have identified individual markers in patients with heart failure, including demographic data, aetiology, comorbidities, clinical, radiological, haemodynamic, echocardiographic and biochemical parameters. Several scoring systems have been proposed to identify adverse events, such as destabilizations, re-hospitalizations and mortality. This article reviews scoring systems for heart failure prognostication, with particular mention of those models with exercise tolerance objective definition. Although most of the models include readily available clinical information, quite a few of them comprise circulating levels of natriuretic peptides and a more objective evaluation of exercise tolerance. A literature review was also conducted to (a) identify heart failure risk-prediction models, (b) assess statistical approach, and (c) identify common variables.

Keywords: Risk prediction models; heart failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ketchum ES, Levy WC. Establishing prognosis in heart failure: A multimarker approach. Progr Cardiovasc Dis 2011; 54: 86–96. - PubMed
    1. Alba AC, Agoritsas T, Jankowski M, et al. Risk prediction models for mortality in ambulatory patients with heart failure. A systematic review. Circ Heart Fail 2013; 6: 881–889. - PubMed
    1. Howlett JG. Should we perform a heart failure risk score? Circ Heart Fail 2013; 6: 4–5. - PubMed
    1. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Block G, Horwich T, et al. Reverse epidemiology of conventional cardiovascular risk factors in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1439–1444. - PubMed
    1. Piepoli MF, Corrà U, Veglia F, et al.; on behalf of the MECKI Score Research Group. Exercise tolerance can explain the obesity paradox in patients with systolic heart failure: Data from the MECKI study group. Eur J Heart Fail 2016; 18: 545--553. - PubMed