Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec;27(2_suppl):52-58.
doi: 10.1177/2047487320961898.

Risk stratification in cardiomyopathy

Affiliations
Review

Risk stratification in cardiomyopathy

Gianfranco Sinagra et al. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Prognostic stratification of cardiomyopathies represents a cornerstone for the appropriate management of patients and is focused mainly on arrhythmic events and heart failure. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing provides additional prognostic information, particularly in the setting of heart failure. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing data, integrated in scores such as the Metabolism Exercise Cardiac Kidney Index score have been shown to improve the risk stratification of these patients. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing has been analysed as a potential supplier of prognostic parameters in the context of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, for which it has been shown that a reduced oxygen consumption peak, an increased ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope and chronotropic incompetence correlate with a worse prognosis. To a lesser extent, in dilated cardiomyopathy, it has been shown that the percentage of oxygen consumption peak, not the pure value, and the ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope are associated with a greater cardiovascular risk. Few data are available about other cardiomyopathies (arrhythmogenic and restrictive). Cardiomyopathy patients should be early and routinely referred to heart failure advanced centres in order to perform a comprehensive risk stratification which should include a cardiopulmonary exercise test, with variables and cut-offs shown to improve their risk stratification.

Keywords: CPET; Cardiomyopathy; MECKY score; exercise; prognosis; risk stratification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Parameters for the calculation of the metabolism exercise cardiac kidney index (MECKI) score: metabolic exercise (peak VO2% pred, VE/VCO2 slope), cardiac (LVEF), kidney (MDRD, ml/min), index. VO2: oxygen consumption; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; MDRD: Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study. VE: ventilation; VCO2: carbon dioxide production.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Survival free from cardiovascular death/heart transplantation in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients. Kaplan–Meier survival curves stratified by peak VO2/kg (14–12 mL/kg/min refers to the classically used cut-points for peak VO2, respectively, in the presence or absence of beta-blocker therapy, upper left panel), peak VO2% cut-point 60%, upper right panel), VE/VCO2 slope (cut-point 29, bottom left panel), combination of peak VO2% (cut-point 60%) and VE/VCO2 slope (cut-point 29, bottom right panel). D/HTx: cardiovascular death/heart transplantation; peak VO2/kg: peak of oxygen consumption per kg; peak VO2%: percentage of predicted oxygen consumption; VCO2: carbon dioxide production; VE: ventilation. Reproduced from Sinagra et al., with permission.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Relationships between oxygen pulse (VO2/HR) versus heart rate (HR) in a patient with asymptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) (left column) and in a patient with New York Heart Association (NYHA II) mildly symptomatic HCM with end-stage phase (right column). Although different in magnitude, both patients showed a reduced VO2 peak (70% and 55%), an early oxygen pulse flattening with a compensatory HR increase. Reproduced from Magrì and Santolamazza, with permission.

References

    1. Elliott P, Andersson B, Arbustini E, et al. Classification of the cardiomyopathies: a position statement from the European Society of Cardiology working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 270–276. - PubMed
    1. Seferović PM, Polovina M, Bauersachs J, et al. Heart failure in cardiomyopathies: a position paper from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2019; 21: 553–576. - PubMed
    1. Arzilli C, Aimo A, Vergaro G, et al. N-terminal fraction of pro-B-type natriuretic peptide versus clinical risk scores for prognostic stratification in chronic systolic heart failure. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2018; 25: 889–895. DOI: 10.1177/2047487318766580. - PubMed
    1. Corrà U, Agostoni P, Giordano A, et al. The metabolic exercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes (MECKI) score and prognosis in heart failure. A validation study. Int J Cardiol 2016; 203: 1067–1072. - PubMed
    1. Guazzi M. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and risk stratification in heart failure with reduced, midrange or preserved ejection fraction: when nomenclature may not match with pathophysiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2018; 25: 392–394. DOI: 10.1177/2047487317748456. - PubMed