Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Jan 21;59(2):e02727-20.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.02727-20. Print 2021 Jan 21.

Comparison of the Quidel Sofia SARS FIA Test to the Hologic Aptima SARS-CoV-2 TMA Test for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Symptomatic Outpatients

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of the Quidel Sofia SARS FIA Test to the Hologic Aptima SARS-CoV-2 TMA Test for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Symptomatic Outpatients

Eric T Beck et al. J Clin Microbiol. .

Abstract

The Quidel Sofia severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) fluorescent immunoassay (FIA) test (SOFIA) is a rapid antigen immunoassay for the detection of SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) proteins from nasal or nasopharyngeal swab specimens. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of the SOFIA test to those of the Hologic Aptima SARS-CoV-2 TMA test (APTIMA TMA), a high-throughput molecular diagnostic test that uses transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid from upper respiratory tract specimens. Three hundred forty-seven symptomatic patients from an urgent care center in an area with a high prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections were tested in parallel using nasal swabs for the SOFIA test and nasopharyngeal swabs for the APTIMA TMA test. The SOFIA test demonstrated a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 82.0% with the APTIMA TMA test for symptomatic patients tested ≤5 days from symptom onset and a PPA of 54.5% for symptomatic patients >5 days from symptom onset. The Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) test was used to determine the cycle threshold (CT ) value for any specimens that were discrepant between the SOFIA and APTIMA TMA tests. Using a CT value of ≤35 as a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 culture positivity, we estimate that the SOFIA test detected 87.2% of symptomatic patients tested ≤5 days from symptom onset who were likely to be culture positive.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Sofia; rapid antigen.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chartrand C, Tremblay N, Renaud C, Papenburg J. 2015. Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen detection tests for respiratory syncytial virus infection: systemic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol 53:3738–3749. doi:10.1128/JCM.01816-15. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bruning AHL, Leeflang MMG, Vos JMBW, Spijker R, de Jong MD, Wolthers KC, Pajkrt D. 2017. Rapid tests for influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, and other respiratory viruses: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 65:1026–1032. doi:10.1093/cid/cix461. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Merckx J, Wali R, Schiller I, Caya C, Gore GC, Chartrand C, Dendukuri N, Papenburg J. 2017. Diagnostic accuracy of novel and traditional rapid tests for influenza infection compared with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 167:394–409. doi:10.7326/M17-0848. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scohy A, Anantharajah A, Bodeus M, Kabamba-Mukadi B, Verroken A, Rodriguez-Villalobos H. 2020. Low performance of rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis. J Clin Virol 129:104455. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104455. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bullard J, Dust K, Funk D, Strong JE, Alexander D, Garnett L, Boodman C, Bello A, Hedley A, Schiffman Z, Doan K, Bastien N, Li Y, Van Caeseele PG, Poliquin G. 22 May 2020, posting date. Predicting infectious SARS-CoV02 from diagnostic samples. Clin Infect Dis doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa638. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances