Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 10:11:543889.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.543889. eCollection 2020.

I Cannot Read Your Eye Expression: Suicide Attempters Have Difficulties in Interpreting Complex Social Emotions

Affiliations

I Cannot Read Your Eye Expression: Suicide Attempters Have Difficulties in Interpreting Complex Social Emotions

Inés Ferrer et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: The ability to differentiate emotions in social contexts is important for dealing with challenging social situations. Suicide attempters show some difficulties in emotion recognition that may result in hypersensitivity to social stress. However, other studies on the recognition of social complex emotions found that suicide attempters have similar performances as depressed non-attempters. Objectives: To investigate differences in social emotion recognition in patients with current Major Depressive Episode (MDE) with and without history of suicide attempt. Methods: Two hundred and ten patients with MDE were recruited among whom 115 had lifetime history of suicide attempt (suicide attempters, SA) and 95 did not (affective controls, AC). Recognition of complex social emotions was assessed using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET). Emotions were separated in three valence categories: positive, negative, and neutral. Verbal intelligence quotient (IQ) and attention were measured with the National Adult Reading Task (NART) and the d2 test, respectively. Results: Mixed logistic regression models adjusted for sex, lifetime bipolar disorder, verbal IQ and attention showed that the RMET performance for neutral emotions was worse in the SA than AC group (OR = 0.87 [0.75, 0.99]). Furthermore, when violent/serious SA were compared to non-violent/non-serious SA and AC, the RMET neutral valence category showed a trend for group factor (p < 0.059) and RMET scores were lower in the violent/serious SA than AC group (OR = 0.79 [0.64, 0.96]). Conclusion: Recognition of neutral emotions is poor in SA and this may complicate their daily life. Interventions to improve the understanding of complex emotions may be helpful to prevent suicidal risk in patients with depression.

Keywords: RMET; emotion recognition; major depressive disorder; severity; suicide attempt.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage (mean ± SEM) of correct answers for all photographs (total) and for each of three valence categories (positive, negative, and neutral) of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test; (A) Comparison between patients with current major depressive episode (MDE) with and without (affective controls) lifetime suicide attempt history; (B) Comparison of patients with MDE without (affective controls) and with history of serious/violent suicide attempts, or history of non-serious/ non-violent suicide attempts.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization Suicide prevention (SUPRE). WHO; (2018).
    1. Bachmann S. Epidemiology of suicide and the psychiatric perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2018) 15:E1425. 10.3390/ijerph15071425 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glenn CR, Kleiman EM, Cha CB, Deming CA, Franklin JC, Nock MK. Understanding suicide risk within the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework: A meta-analytic review. Depress Anxiety. (2018) 35:65–88. 10.1002/da.22686 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Courtet P, Olié E. Neurobiology of suicidal behavior and social stress. J Neurosci Res. (2020) 98:579–80. 10.1002/jnr.24573 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Heeringen K, Mann JJ. The neurobiology of suicide. Lancet Psychiatry. (2014) 1:63–72. 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70220-2 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources