Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov 9:7:590867.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.590867. eCollection 2020.

The Power of a Positive Human-Animal Relationship for Animal Welfare

Affiliations
Review

The Power of a Positive Human-Animal Relationship for Animal Welfare

Jean-Loup Rault et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Domestic animals often seek and enjoy interacting with humans. Positive human-animal relationships can elicit positive emotions and other positive welfare outcomes. Nevertheless, our understanding of the underlying processes that govern the positive perception of humans by animals is incomplete. We cover the potential mechanisms involved in the development and maintenance of positive human-animal relationships from the perspective of the animal. This encompasses habituation, associative learning, and possibly attachment or bonding based on communication and social cognition. We review the indicators from the literature to assess a positive human-animal relationship. We operationally define this positive relationship as the animal showing voluntary approach and spatial proximity (seeking) and signs of anticipation, pleasure, relaxation, or other indicators of a rewarding experience from interacting with the human. For research, we recommend accounting for the baseline human-animal relationship in the animal's everyday life, and incorporating a control treatment rather than only comparing positive to negative interaction treatments. Furthermore, animal characteristics, such as previous experience, genetics, and individual predisposition, as well as contextual characteristics related to the social and physical environment, may modulate the perception of humans by animals. The human-animal relationship is also influenced by human characteristics, such as the person's familiarity to the animal, attitudes, skills, and knowledge. We highlight implications for current practices and suggest simple solutions, such as paying attention to the animal's behavioral response to humans and providing choice and control to the animal in terms of when and how to interact with humans. Practical applications to achieve a positive perception of humans could be better utilized, such as by incorporating training principles, while keeping in mind trust and safety of both partners. Overall, there is growing evidence in the scientific literature that a positive human-animal relationship can bring intrinsic rewards to the animals and thereby benefit animal welfare. Further research is needed on the underlying processes to establish an effective positive human-animal relationship, especially in regard to the type, frequency, and length of human interaction necessary. In particular, the importance of providing animals with a sense of agency over their interactions with humans remains poorly understood.

Keywords: agency; domestic; inter-species; interaction; perception; positive welfare; welfare assessment; well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The different dimensions of a positive human–animal relationship for the animal. The arrows symbolize the interactions between the animal and the human.

References

    1. Hemsworth PH, Sherwen SL, Coleman GJ. Human contact. In: Appleby M. editor. Animal Welfare. Wallingford: CAB International; (2018). p. 294–314.
    1. Waiblinger S. Agricultural animals. In: Hosey G, Melfi V. editors. Anthrozoology: Human–Animal Interactions in Domesticated and Wild Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press; (2019), p. 32–58.
    1. Boivin X. Animal experience of domestication. In: Butterworth A. editor. Animal Welfare in a Changing World. Wallingford: CABI; (2018). p. 154–61.
    1. Pinillos RG, Appleby MC, Manteca X, Scott-Park F, Smith C, Velarde A. One welfare—a platform for improving human and animal welfare. Vet Rec. (2016) 179:412–13. 10.1136/vr.i5470 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ. Human-Livestock Interactions: The Stockperson and The Productivity and Welfare of Intensively Farmed Animals. Wallingford: CABI; (2011).

LinkOut - more resources