Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 9:7:601874.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.601874. eCollection 2020.

In vivo Microbiome Profiling of the Luminal and Mucosal Surface of the Duodenum Using a Cannulated Yearling Bovine Model

Affiliations

In vivo Microbiome Profiling of the Luminal and Mucosal Surface of the Duodenum Using a Cannulated Yearling Bovine Model

Ricardo M Stockler et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

The gut microbiome provides important metabolic functions for the host animal. Bacterial dysbiosis as a result of bacterial, viral, and parasitic gastrointestinal infections can adversely affect the metabolism, productivity, and overall health. The objective of this study is to characterize the commensal microbiome present in the lumen and the mucosal surface of the duodenum of cattle, as we hypothesize that due to metabolic processes and or host proprieties, there are differences in the natural microbiota present in the mucosal surface and luminal contents of the bovine duodenum. Duodenal lumen contents and mucosal biopsies were collected from six dairy crossbred yearling steers. A flexible video-endoscope was used to harvest biopsy samples via a T shaped intestinal cannula. In order to assess as much environmental and individual steer microbiota variation as possible, each animal was sampled three times over a 6 week period. The DNA was extracted from the samples and submitted for16S rRNA gene Ion Torrent PGM bacterial sequencing. A detailed descriptive analysis from phylum to genus taxonomic level was reported. Differences in the microbiome population between two different sites within the duodenum were successfully characterized. A great and significant microbiota diversity was found between the luminal and mucosal biopsy At the phylum taxonomic level, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes composed over 80% of the microbiome. Further analysis at lower taxonomic levels, class, family, and genus, showed distinct diversity and distribution of the microbiome. Characterizing the gastrointestinal microbiome in vivo is imperative. The novelty of this study is the use of live cattle undergoing customary husbandry allowing real-time analysis of the duodenum microbiome contributing to the literature with respect to the bovine duodenum microbiome.

Keywords: GIT microbiome; bovine microbiome; duodenal cannulation; in vivo microbiome; metagenomic analyses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Phylogenetic rarefaction curves estimating species richness. The rarefaction curves produce smoother lines facilitating full dataset comparison by reaching a clear asymptote.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of bacterial OTU's Shannon index diversity and Pielou's evenness for the mucosal surface and lumen contents for each week sampled.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Multidimensional scaling plot (MDS) of bacterial lineages in the mucosal surface and lumen contents.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Bacterial phylum. Stacked bar chart representing the abundance of the top five phyla microbiota in the mucosal biopsy surface and lumen contents across the sampled weeks for each animal.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Bacterial class. Stacked bar chart representing the abundance of the microbiota at the class taxonomic level in the mucosal biopsy surface and lumen contents across the sampled weeks for each animal.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Bacterial family. Stacked bar chart representing the abundance of the microbiota at the family taxonomic level in the mucosal biopsy surface and lumen contents across the sampled weeks for each animal.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Bacterial genus. Stacked bar chart representing the abundance of the microbiota at the genus taxonomic level in the mucosal biopsy surface and lumen contents across the sampled weeks for each animal.

References

    1. Sekirov I, Russell SL, Antunes LC, Finlay BB. Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiol Rev. (2010) 90:859–904. 10.1152/physrev.00045.2009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krajmalnik-Brown R, Ilhan ZE, Kang DW, DiBaise JK. Effects of gut microbes on nutrient absorption and energy regulation. Nutr Clin Pract. (2012) 27:201–14. 10.1177/0884533611436116 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goto Y, Yaegashi G, Fukunari K, Suzuki T. Design of a multiplex quantitative reverse transcription-PCR system to simultaneously detect 16 pathogens associated with bovine respiratory and enteric diseases. J Appl Microbiol. (2020) 129:832–47. 10.1111/jam.14685 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Firkins JL, Yu Z. RUMINANT NUTRITION SYMPOSIUM: how to use data on the rumen microbiome to improve our understanding of ruminant nutrition. J Anim Sci. (2015) 93:1450–70. 10.2527/jas.2014-8754 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Creevey CJ, Kelly WJ, Henderson G, Leahy SC. Determining the culturability of the rumen bacterial microbiome. Microb Biotechnol. (2014) 7:467–79. 10.1111/1751-7915.12141 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources