Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Dec 9;100(19):adv00347.
doi: 10.2340/00015555-3708.

Prevalence of Atrophic and Hypertrophic Skin Ageing Phenotypes: A UK-based Observational Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Prevalence of Atrophic and Hypertrophic Skin Ageing Phenotypes: A UK-based Observational Study

Abigail K Langton et al. Acta Derm Venereol. .
No abstract available

Keywords: skin aging; skin neoplasms; prevalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Assessment of gender and photoageing severity for atrophic and hypertrophic phenotypes. (a) An 84-year-old man with atrophic photoageing demonstrates paucity of coarse wrinkles and presence of telangiectasia. A 72-year-old woman with hypertrophic photoageing demonstrates characteristic deep, coarse wrinkling of the cheek and minimal to absent erythema. (b) Photonumeric scales were used to assess the degree of photoageing for each participant. Each photonumeric scale ranged from 0–8, where 0 represents absence of the form of photoageing and 8 indicates severe photoageing (atrophic or hypertrophic). The relative frequency of atrophic photoageing severity was not different between males and females; whereas in hypertrophic photoageing, females had a more severe phenotype than males (b).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ayer J, Ahmed A, Duncan-Parry E, Beck P, Griffiths TW, Watson REB, et al. . A photonumeric scale for the assessment of atrophic facial photodamage. Br J Dermatol 2018; 178: 1190–1195. - PubMed
    1. Brooke RC, Newbold SA, Telfer NR, Griffiths CEM. Discordance between facial wrinkling and the presence of basal cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137: 751–754. - PubMed
    1. Griffiths CEM, Wang TS, Hamilton TA, Voorhees JJ, Ellis CN. A photonumeric scale for the assessment of cutaneous photodamage. Arch Dermatol 1992; 128: 347–351. - PubMed
    1. Pardo LM, Hamer MA, Liu F, Velthuis P, Kayser M, Gunn DA, et al. . Principal component analysis of seven skin-ageing features identifies three main types of skin ageing. Br J Dermatol 2020; 182: 1379–1387. - PubMed
    1. Sachs DL, Varani J, Chubb H, Fligiel SEG, Cui Y, Calderone K, et al. . Atrophic and hypertrophic photoaging: Clinical, histologic, and molecular features of 2 distinct phenotypes of photoaged skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 81: 480–488. - PubMed

Publication types