Iatrogenic catheter-induced ostial coronary artery dissections: Prevalence, management, and mortality from a cohort of 55,968 patients over 10 years
- PMID: 33241605
- PMCID: PMC8518823
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29382
Iatrogenic catheter-induced ostial coronary artery dissections: Prevalence, management, and mortality from a cohort of 55,968 patients over 10 years
Abstract
Objective: We sought to describe the prevalence, management strategies and evaluate the prognosis of patients with iatrogenic catheter-induced ostial coronary artery dissection (ICOCAD).
Background: ICOCAD is a rare but potentially devastating complication of cardiac catheterisation. The clinical manifestations of ICOCAD vary from asymptomatic angiographic findings to abrupt vessel closure leading to myocardial infarction and death.
Methods: 55,968 patients who underwent coronary angiography over a 10-year period were screened for ICOCAD as defined by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The management and all-cause mortality were retrieved from local and national databases.
Results: The overall prevalence of ICOCAD was 0.09% (51/55,968 patients). Guide catheters accounted for 75% (n = 37) of cases. Half of the ICOCAD cases involved the right coronary artery while the remaining were related to left main stem (23/51; 45%) and left internal mammary artery (2/51; 4%). Two-thirds of ICOCAD were high grade (type D, E, and F). The majority of cases were type F dissections (n = 18; 66%), of which two third occurred in females in their 60s. The majority of ICOCAD patients (42/51; 82%) were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention while the remaining underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (3/51; 6%) or managed conservatively (6/51; 12%). Three deaths occurred during the index admission while 48/51 patients (94.1%) were safely discharged without further mortality over a median follow-up of 3.6 years.
Conclusions: ICOCAD is a rare but life-threatening complication of coronary angiography. Timely recognition and prompt bailout PCI is a safe option for majority of patients with good clinical outcomes.
Keywords: angiography; complications; coronary; coronary aneurysm/dissection/perforation; diagnostic catheterization; percutaneous coronary intervention.
© 2020 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
The disasters we create: Iatrogenic catheter-induced ostial coronary artery dissection.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Oct;98(4):656-657. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29904. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021. PMID: 34596338 No abstract available.
References
-
- Huber MS, Mooney JF, Madison J, Mooney MR. Use of a morphologic classification to predict clinical outcome after dissection from coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68(5):467‐471. - PubMed
-
- Eshtehardi P, Adorjan P, Togni M, et al. Iatrogenic left main coronary artery dissection: incidence, classification, management, and long‐term follow‐up. Am Heart J. 2010;159(6):1147‐1153. - PubMed
-
- Liu X, Tsujita K, Maehara A, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of the incidence and predictors of edge dissections after drug‐eluting stent implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(10):997‐1004. - PubMed
-
- Muramatsu T, Garcia‐Garcia HM, Onuma Y, et al. Intimal flaps detected by optical frequency domain imaging in the proximal segments of native coronary arteries: an innocent bystander? Insights from the TROFI trial. Circ J: Off J Japanese Circ Soc. 2013;77(9):2327‐2333. - PubMed
-
- Radu MD, Raber L, Heo J, et al. Natural history of optical coherence tomography‐detected non‐flow‐limiting edge dissections following drug‐eluting stent implantation. EuroIntervention. 2014;9(9):1085‐1094. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
