Does oncological outcome differ between restorative and nonrestorative low anterior resection in patients with primary rectal cancer?
- PMID: 33245846
- PMCID: PMC8247354
- DOI: 10.1111/codi.15464
Does oncological outcome differ between restorative and nonrestorative low anterior resection in patients with primary rectal cancer?
Abstract
Aim: Nonrestorative low anterior resection (n-rLAR) (also known as low Hartmann's) is performed for rectal cancer when a poor functional outcome is anticipated or there have been problems when constructing the anastomosis. Compared with restorative LAR (rLAR), little oncological outcome data are available for n-rLAR. The aim of this study was to compare oncological outcomes between rLAR and n-rLAR for primary rectal cancer.
Method: This was a nationwide cross-sectional comparative study including all elective sphincter-saving LAR procedures for nonmetastatic primary rectal cancer performed in 2011 in 71 Dutch hospitals. Oncological outcomes of patients undergoing rLAR and n-rLAR were collected in 2015; the data were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the results compared using log-rank testing. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between the type of LAR and oncological outcome measures.
Results: A total of 1197 patients were analysed, of whom 892 (75%) underwent rLAR and 305 (25%) underwent n-rLAR. The 3-year local recurrence (LR) rate was 3% after rLAR and 8% after n-rLAR (P < 0.001). The 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 77% (rLAR) vs 62% (n-rLAR) (P < 0.001) and 90% (rLAR) vs 75% (n-rLAR) (P < 0.001), respectively. In multivariable Cox analysis, n-rLAR was independently associated with a higher risk of LR (OR = 2.95) and worse overall survival (OR = 1.72).
Conclusion: This nationwide study revealed that n-rLAR for rectal cancer was associated with poorer oncological outcome than r-LAR. This is probably a noncausal relationship, and might reflect technical difficulties during low pelvic dissection in a subset of those patients, with oncological implications.
Keywords: local recurrence; low anterior resection; oncological outcome; rectal surgery.
© 2020 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures
Comment in
-
Nonrestorative low anterior resection portends increased local recurrences - results from the Dutch snapshot research group.Colorectal Dis. 2021 May;23(5):1270-1271. doi: 10.1111/codi.15580. Epub 2021 Mar 4. Colorectal Dis. 2021. PMID: 33567118 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Kazi et al.Colorectal Dis. 2021 May;23(5):1271-1272. doi: 10.1111/codi.15579. Epub 2021 Mar 2. Colorectal Dis. 2021. PMID: 33567133 No abstract available.
References
-
- Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD, Sexton R, MacFarlane JK. Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978–1997. Arch Surg. 1998;133:894–9. - PubMed
-
- Desai DC, Brennan EJ Jr, Reilly JF, Smink RD Jr. The utility of the Hartmann procedure. Am J Surg. 1998;175:152–4. - PubMed
-
- Seah DW, Ibrahim S, Tay KH. Hartmann procedure: is it still relevant today? ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:436–40. - PubMed
-
- Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Kepka L, Oledzki J, Bebenek M, Kryj M. Postoperative complications in patients irradiated pre‐operatively for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial comparing short‐term radiotherapy vs chemoradiation. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:410–6. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous