When will individuals meet their personalized probabilities? A philosophical note on risk prediction
- PMID: 33247797
- DOI: 10.1007/s10654-020-00700-w
When will individuals meet their personalized probabilities? A philosophical note on risk prediction
Abstract
Risk prediction is one of the central goals of medicine. However, ultimate prediction-perfectly predicting whether individuals will actually get a disease-is still out of reach for virtually all conditions. One crucial assumption of ultimate personalized prediction is that individual risks in the relevant sense exist. In the present paper we argue that perfect prediction at the individual level will fail-and we will do so by providing pragmatic, epistemic, conceptual, and ontological arguments.
Keywords: Individual risk; Ontology; Philosophy; Prediction; Reference class.
References
-
- Ganz P, Heidecker B, Hveem K, Jonasson C, Kato S, Segal MR, et al. Development and validation of a protein-based risk score for cardiovascular outcomes among patients with stable coronary heart disease. JAMA. 2016;315(23):2532–41. - PubMed
-
- Kent DM, Steyerberg E, van Klaveren D. Personalized evidence based medicine: predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2018;363:k4245.
-
- Goodman SN. Probability at the bedside: the knowing of chances or the chances of knowing? Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(7):604–6. - PubMed
-
- Mahmood SS, Levy D, Vasan RS, Wang TJ. The Framingham Heart Study and the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease: a historical perspective. Lancet (Lond, Engl). 2014;383(9921):999–1008.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources