Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;24(1):19-32.
doi: 10.1111/hex.13167. Epub 2020 Nov 28.

Enhancing shared and surrogate decision making for people living with dementia: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions

Affiliations

Enhancing shared and surrogate decision making for people living with dementia: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions

Andrew Geddis-Regan et al. Health Expect. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Dementia can have a profound impact on decision making. People living with dementia (PLwD) often need to make decisions about health care, and, as dementia progresses, decisions may need to be made on their behalf. Specific interventions may support this process.

Review question: What interventions are effective in improving shared decision making or surrogate decision making on the health care of PLwD?

Methods: A narrative systematic review of existing literature was conducted. Seven databases, grey literature and key journals were searched. After exclusion by title, abstracts then full texts were reviewed collaboratively to manage any disagreements.

Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Two articles, including one RCT, evaluated decision aids regarding the use of enteral feeding in advanced dementia. Six further articles, including five RCTs, were found which evaluated the effectiveness of interventions supporting patients or carers with advance care planning.

Conclusion: Decision-making interventions typically consist of multiple components which aim to establish preferences for future health care. Advance care planning interventions supported aspects of the decision-making processes but their impact on decision quality was rarely evaluated. Interventions did not increase the concordance of decisions with a person's values. The decision-specific interventions are unlikely to produce benefit in other decision contexts.

Patient involvement: Two caregivers, a public stakeholder group and a carer group were consulted in the design of the wider study to which this review relates. Six PLwD refined the research questions addressed in this paper.

Keywords: cognitive impairment; decision making; dementia; proxy decision making; shared decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA Flow diagram. Multiple studies were excluded for more than one of the below reasons: the most influential factor leading to exclusion is detailed here

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health . Dementia. British Psychological Society & Royal College of Psychiatrists. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health; 2007.
    1. Alzheimer’s Disease International . World Alzheimer’s Report 2015: The Global Impact of Dementia [Internet]. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International; 2015.
    1. Lamahewa K, Mathew R, Iliffe S, et al. A qualitative study exploring the difficulties influencing decision making at the end of life for people with dementia. Health Expect. 2018;21:118‐127. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chau PH, Kwok T, Woo J, Chan F, Hui E, Chan KC. Disagreement in preference for residential care between family caregivers and elders is greater among cognitively impaired elders group than cognitively intact elders group. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;25:46‐54. - PubMed
    1. Kerr K, Curl C, Geddis‐Regan A. The impact of dementia on oral health and dental care, part 1: Setting the scene for dental care Provision. Prim Dent J 2020;9:24‐30. - PubMed

Publication types