Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;32(1):74-84.
doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Nov 25.

Anthropomorphic lung phantom based validation of in-room proton therapy 4D-CBCT image correction for dose calculation

Affiliations

Anthropomorphic lung phantom based validation of in-room proton therapy 4D-CBCT image correction for dose calculation

David Bondesson et al. Z Med Phys. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Ventilation-induced tumour motion remains a challenge for the accuracy of proton therapy treatments in lung patients. We investigated the feasibility of using a 4D virtual CT (4D-vCT) approach based on deformable image registration (DIR) and motion-aware 4D CBCT reconstruction (MA-ROOSTER) to enable accurate daily proton dose calculation using a gantry-mounted CBCT scanner tailored to proton therapy.

Methods: Ventilation correlated data of 10 breathing phases were acquired from a porcine ex-vivo functional lung phantom using CT and CBCT. 4D-vCTs were generated by (1) DIR of the mid-position 4D-CT to the mid-position 4D-CBCT (reconstructed with the MA-ROOSTER) using a diffeomorphic Morphons algorithm and (2) subsequent propagation of the obtained mid-position vCT to the individual 4D-CBCT phases. Proton therapy treatment planning was performed to evaluate dose calculation accuracy of the 4D-vCTs. A robust treatment plan delivering a nominal dose of 60Gy was generated on the average intensity image of the 4D-CT for an approximated internal target volume (ITV). Dose distributions were then recalculated on individual phases of the 4D-CT and the 4D-vCT based on the optimized plan. Dose accumulation was performed for 4D-vCT and 4D-CT using DIR of each phase to the mid position, which was chosen as reference. Dose based on the 4D-vCT was then evaluated against the dose calculated on 4D-CT both, phase-by-phase as well as accumulated, by comparing dose volume histogram (DVH) values (Dmean, D2%, D98%, D95%) for the ITV, and by a 3D-gamma index analysis (global, 3%/3mm, 5Gy, 20Gy and 30Gy dose thresholds).

Results: Good agreement was found between the 4D-CT and 4D-vCT-based ITV-DVH curves. The relative differences ((CT-vCT)/CT) between accumulated values of ITV Dmean, D2%, D95% and D98% for the 4D-CT and 4D-vCT-based dose distributions were -0.2%, 0.0%, -0.1% and -0.1%, respectively. Phase specific values varied between -0.5% and 0.2%, -0.2% and 0.5%, -3.5% and 1.5%, and -5.7% and 2.3%. The relative difference of accumulated Dmean over the lungs was 2.3% and Dmean for the phases varied between -5.4% and 5.8%. The gamma pass-rates with 5Gy, 20Gy and 30Gy thresholds for the accumulated doses were 96.7%, 99.6% and 99.9%, respectively. Phase-by-phase comparison yielded pass-rates between 86% and 97%, 88% and 98%, and 94% and 100%.

Conclusions: Feasibility of the suggested 4D-vCT workflow using proton therapy specific imaging equipment was shown. Results indicate the potential of the method to be applied for daily 4D proton dose estimation.

Keywords: 4D-vCT; Cone-beam; Motion; Proton therapy; Thorax; Tomography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ex vivo functional porcine lung phantom used for CBCT and CT measurements.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Workflow to generate a 4D-vCT image from a 4D-CT image and CBCT projections. MA-ROOSTER uses the CBCT projections to generate a 4D-CBCT. The initial planning 4D-CT is used to generate a mid position CT as well as to extract the DVFs input to the MA-ROOSTER.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Workflow to calculate the accumulated dose for both 4D-CT and 4D-vCT. The optimized treatment plan was generated on the averaged intensity image of the 4D-CT. The treatment plan (upper left corner) was optimized on a voxel-wise image averaged along the 10 ventilation phases.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(1st to 3rd row) Display of sagittal slices from 4D-CT as well as reconstructed 4D-CBCT and 4D-vCT images (ventilation phases 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10). Dotted lines highlight the diaphragm position at maximum exhale. The ITV is depicted in yellow. (4th row) Sagittal slices of difference images (4D vCT minus 4D-CT) in HU. Red arrows highlight particular registration discrepancies occuring particularly around transitional points between tissue and the phantom. The black arrow highlights a vertical registration discrepancy at the same height as streaking artefacts produced in the CBCT reconstructions.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Dose distributions (top and middle row) and dose differences (bottom row) on phases 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 between 4D-CT and 4D-vCT images. The ITV is displayed on the 4D-CT in yellow.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison of DVH curves for the ITV and lungs (without the ITV) from 4D-vCT (solid) and 4D-CT (dotted) doses (all phases and accumulated).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen J., Lu J.J., Ma N., Zhao J., Chen C., Fan M., et al. Early stage non-small cell lung cancer treated with pencil beam scanning particle therapy: retrospective analysis of early results on safety and efficacy. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14:16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nakajima K., Iwata H., Ogino H., Hattori Y., Hashimoto S., Toshito T., et al. Clinical outcomes of image-guided proton therapy for histologically confirmed stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2018;13:199. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ono T., Nakamura T., Yamaguchi H., Azami Y., Takayama K., Suzuki M., et al. Clinical results of proton beam therapy for elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2018;13:19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Knopf A.-C., Lomax A. In vivo proton range verification: a review. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58:R131–R160. - PubMed
    1. Yang M., Zhu X.R., Park P.C., Titt U., Mohan R., Virshup G., et al. Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to patient stopping-power-ratio estimation using the stoichiometric calibration. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:4095–4115. - PMC - PubMed