Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Apr 8;32(3):467-475.
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa284.

Comparison of left ventricular unloading strategies on venoarterial extracorporeal life support

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of left ventricular unloading strategies on venoarterial extracorporeal life support

Ali İhsan Hasde et al. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. .

Abstract

Objectives: Our goal was to compare the haemodynamic effects of different mechanical left ventricular (LV) unloading strategies and clinical outcomes in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO).

Methods: A total of 448 patients supported with VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock between 1 March 2015 and 31 January 2020 were included and analysed in a single-centre, retrospective case-control study. Fifty-three patients (11.8%) on VA-ECMO required LV unloading. Percutaneous balloon atrial septostomy (PBAS), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and transapical LV vent (TALVV) strategies were compared with regards to the composite rate of death, procedure-related complications and neurological complications. The secondary outcomes were reduced pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, central venous pressure, left atrial diameter and resolution of pulmonary oedema on a chest X-ray within 48 h.

Results: No death related to the LV unloading procedure was detected. Reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was highest with the TALVV technique (17.2 ± 2.1 mmHg; P < 0.001) and was higher in the PBAS than in the IABP group; the difference was significant (9.6 ± 2.5 and 3.9 ± 1.3, respectively; P = 0.001). Reduction in central venous pressure with TALVV was highest with the other procedures (7.4 ± 1.1 mmHg; P < 0.001). However, procedure-related complications were significantly higher with TALVV compared to the PBAS and IABP groups (50% vs 17.6% and 10%, respectively; P = 0.015). We observed no significant differences in mortality or neurological complications between the groups.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that TALVV was the most effective method for LV unloading compared with PBAS and IABP for VA-ECMO support but was associated with complications. Efficient LV unloading may not improve survival.

Keywords: Left ventricular unloading; Percutaneous balloon atrial septostomy; Transapical left ventricular vent; Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Overview of study flow diagram. BIVAD: biventricular assist device; LV: left ventricle; RCS: refractory cardiogenic shock; RV: right ventricle; VA-ECMO: venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Haemodynamic changes after 3 different left ventricular unloading strategies. CVP: central venous pressure; LV: left ventricle; PCWP: pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; SPAP: systolic pulmonary artery pressure.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Chest X-ray illustrations of the resolution of pulmonary oedema before and 48 h after LV unloading procedures. IABP: intra-aortic balloon pump; LV: left ventricle; PBAS: percutaneous balloon atrial septostomy; TALVV: transapical left ventricular vent.
None

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guglin M, Zucker MJ, Bazan VM, Bozkurt B, El Banayosy A, Estep JD. et al. Venoarterial ECMO for adults: JACC scientific expert panel. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:698–716. - PubMed
    1. Abrams D, Combes A, Brodie D.. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiopulmonary disease in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:2769–78. - PubMed
    1. Thiagarajan RR, Barbaro RP, Rycus PT, McMullan DM, Conrad SA, Fortenberry JD. et al.; ELSO member centers. Extracorporeal life support organization registry international report 2016. ASAIO J 2017;63:60–7. - PubMed
    1. Rao P, Khalpey Z, Smith R, Burkhoff D, Kociol RD.. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. Circ Heart Fail 2018;11:e004905. - PubMed
    1. Lorusso R, Gelsomino S, Parise O, Mendiratta P, Prodhan P, Rycus P. et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock in elderly patients: trends in application and outcome from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry. Ann Thorac Surg 2017;104:62–9. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms