Switching to Progressively Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes in Smokers With Low Socioeconomic Status: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 33249498
- PMCID: PMC8150128
- DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa247
Switching to Progressively Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes in Smokers With Low Socioeconomic Status: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Introduction: The Food and Drug Administration issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking for setting a product standard for nicotine levels in cigarettes, with an emphasis on minimally or non-addicting very low nicotine content (VLNC).
Methods: A 33 week, two-arm, double-blind randomized trial conducted in Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA and Washington, DC, USA included adult daily cigarette smokers (≥5 cigarettes per day) with less than a college degree, and who had no plans to quit within the next six months. Participants were randomized to either reduced nicotine content (RNC) study cigarettes tapered every three weeks to a final VLNC (0.2 mg/cigarette) for six weeks or to usual nicotine content (UNC) study cigarettes (11.6 mg/cigarette). Outcomes included acceptability of study cigarettes measured by attrition (primary outcome), compliance, reduction in cigarette dependence and tobacco biomarkers, and post-intervention cessation.
Results: The RNC (n = 122) versus UNC (n = 123) group had higher attrition (adjusted Hazard Ratio 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.99 to 5.81). At the end of the intervention, cotinine levels were 50% lower in the RNC group (mean group difference -137 ng/mL; 95% CI -172, -102). The RNC group smoked fewer CPD (-4.1; 95% CI -6.44, -1.75) and had lower carbon monoxide levels (-4.0 ppm; 95% CI -7.7, -0.4). Forty seven percent (29/62) of the RNC group were biochemically-confirmed compliant with smoking VLNC cigarettes (mean cotinine = 8.9 ng/ml). At three month follow-up, only compliant VLNC smokers quit with an assisted quit attempt (N = 6/22, 27%).
Conclusions: This study supports a VLNC standard in cigarettes.
Implications: Differential dropout and noncompliance indicate some smokers had difficulty transitioning to cigarettes with reduced nicotine. These smokers will benefit from supplemental nicotine in medicinal or noncombustible tobacco products if a nicotine reduction standard is established. Other smokers successfully transitioned to very low nicotine content cigarettes exclusively and substantially reduced their exposure to nicotine.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Reduced nicotine content cigarettes in smokers of low socioeconomic status: study protocol for a randomized control trial.Trials. 2017 Jul 3;18(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2038-9. Trials. 2017. PMID: 28673312 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The effects of reduced nicotine content cigarettes on biomarkers of nicotine and toxicant exposure, smoking behavior and psychiatric symptoms in smokers with mood or anxiety disorders: A double-blind randomized trial.PLoS One. 2022 Nov 2;17(11):e0275522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275522. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36322562 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes on cigarette smoking behavior and tobacco smoke toxicant exposure: 2-year follow up.Addiction. 2015 Oct;110(10):1667-75. doi: 10.1111/add.12978. Epub 2015 Jul 21. Addiction. 2015. PMID: 26198394 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of menthol on nicotine reduction: Pooled results from two double-blind randomized controlled trials.Brain Res Bull. 2022 Oct 15;189:131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2022.08.019. Epub 2022 Aug 28. Brain Res Bull. 2022. PMID: 36038015 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A review of the efficacy of smoking-cessation pharmacotherapies in nonwhite populations.Clin Ther. 2008 May;30(5):800-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.05.010. Clin Ther. 2008. PMID: 18555928 Review.
Cited by
-
Qualitative reactions to a low nicotine product standard for cigarettes from adolescents and young adults living in the United States who smoke.Prev Med Rep. 2023 Feb 23;32:102163. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102163. eCollection 2023 Apr. Prev Med Rep. 2023. PMID: 36895826 Free PMC article.
-
A review of the evidence on cigarettes with reduced addictiveness potential.Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Jan;99:103436. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103436. Epub 2021 Sep 15. Int J Drug Policy. 2022. PMID: 34535366 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Racial Differences in Nicotine Reduction: Pooled Results from Two Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials.J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Sep 4:10.1007/s40615-024-02155-1. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02155-1. Online ahead of print. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024. PMID: 39230651
-
Perceptions and Interest in Lung Cancer Screening by Smoking Status: A Cross-Sectional Study of HINTS 6 (2022).Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 30;12(19):1952. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191952. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39408132 Free PMC article.
-
Dietary Patterns among Smokers and Non-Smokers: Findings from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2018.Nutrients. 2024 Jun 27;16(13):2035. doi: 10.3390/nu16132035. Nutrients. 2024. PMID: 38999783 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical