Knowledge of social distancing measures and adherence to restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic
- PMID: 33249695
- PMCID: PMC7753595
- DOI: 10.1002/hpja.443
Knowledge of social distancing measures and adherence to restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic
Abstract
Issue addressed: With no efficacious treatments or vaccines available, social distancing measures remain the most effective approach for reducing the transmission of the COVID-19 virus. However, adherence to social distance measures presumably requires knowledge and understanding of the current social distancing restrictions.
Methods: A modified version of the Theory of Planned Behaviour examined the role of knowledge and understanding of current social distancing measures in predicting intentions to adhere to social distancing restrictions. An online survey was administered to respondents (N = 374) in Melbourne, Australia during a period of heightened social distancing restrictions. In addition to measuring respondents' general intentions to adhere to restrictions, vignettes were used to assess intended behaviour in specific situations.
Results: Knowledge of social distancing restrictions predicted intentions to adhere in specific situations, but not general intentions to adhere. Knowledge of restrictions also predicted positive attitudes towards current restrictions and a greater perceived ability to adhere to the restrictions, while positive attitudes was a good predictor of both general and specific intentions to adhere.
Conclusions: The findings suggest that attitudes towards restrictions may influence whether individuals attempt to adhere to restrictions, but knowledge of the restrictions influences whether the intended behaviour actually adheres to current restrictions. SO WHAT?: These outcomes indicate that members of the public should be educated regarding the negative consequences associated with the COVID-19 virus and the capacity of social distancing to reduce transmission of the virus, and a need for social distancing restrictions to be uncomplicated and clearly communicated.
Keywords: behavioural theory; epidemiology; local government; quantitative methods; social determinants.
© 2020 Australian Health Promotion Association.
Conflict of interest statement
The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Figures



References
-
- Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211.
-
- McEachan RRC, Conner M, Taylor NJ, Lawton RJ. Prospective prediction of health‐related behaviours with the theory of planned behaviour: a meta‐analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2011;5(2):97–144.
-
- Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD. Integrating the theory of planned behaviour and self‐determination theory in health behaviour: a meta‐analysis. Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14(2):275–302. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical