Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2021 Jul-Aug;78(4):1175-1181.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.11.006. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

A Comparison Between In-Person and Virtual Fellowship Interviews During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Kortney A Robinson  1 , Borami Shin  2 , Sidhu P Gangadharan  2
Affiliations
Comment

A Comparison Between In-Person and Virtual Fellowship Interviews During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Kortney A Robinson et al. J Surg Educ. 2021 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Importance: Traditional in-person fellowship interviews require great time and financial commitments. Here, we studied the response of program directors (PDs) and applicants to virtual interviews. Virtual interviews could decrease both financial and time commitments.

Objective: To determine if most applicants and PDs believed that virtual interviews should be used more widely in the future.

Design: After the 2020 cardiothoracic fellowship match, an e-mail survey was sent to 66 program directors and 107 applicants using the Qualtrics platform.

Setting: During the 2020 cardiothoracic fellowship interview cycle, the COVID-19 pandemic shut down travel for in-person interviews. This forced a transition to virtual interviews.

Participants: Of 107 applicants emailed, 46 (44%) participated with a completion rate of 87%. sixty-six PDs were contacted and of those, 36 (55%) participated with a 92% survey completion rate.

Exposure: All survey participants were participants in the 2020 cardiothoracic match. MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S): (1) The percent of participants who agree that virtual interviews should be continued in the future and the percent of participants who agree that virtual interviews could be replacements for in person interviews. (2) Were virtual interviews perceived to have a negative impact on one's ultimate match? (3) What is the current cost of an in-person interview in travel and lodging for an applicant?

Results: Fourty-six applicants (44% participation rate) and 36 PDs (55% participation rate) participated in the survey. Seventy-nine percent of program directors and 55% of applicants either agreed or strongly agreed that virtual interviews should be offered in the future. However, just 15% of PDs and 20% of applicants either agreed or strongly agreed that virtual interviews should be offered without the option of an in-person interview. Twenty-five percent of PDs and applicants agreed or strongly agreed that virtual interviews negatively impacted their chance of matching one of their top applicants/programs. The median cost of an in-person interview was $600 (interquatile range 500-725).

Conclusions and relevance: Most applicants and PDs agree that virtual interviews should be offered in the future. Twenty-five percent of participants reported that they believed virtual interviews negatively impacted their match. Given the overall acceptance of virtual interviews and the cost of in-person interviews, virtual interviews could be useful to incorporate into future interview seasons.

Keywords: COVID-19; Interpersonal and Communication Skills; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Professionalism; applicants; fellowship; in-person interviews; residency; virtual interviews.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
General acceptance of virtual interviews. Green represents applicants. Blue represents Program Directors.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Perception of virtual interviews. Green represents applicants. Blue represents Program Directors.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Components of virtual interviews that applicants missed.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Comment on

  • The Case for Capping Residency Interviews.
    Morgan HK, Winkel AF, Standiford T, Muñoz R, Strand EA, Marzano DA, Ogburn T, Major CA, Cox S, Hammoud MM. Morgan HK, et al. J Surg Educ. 2021 May-Jun;78(3):755-762. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.08.033. Epub 2020 Sep 14. J Surg Educ. 2021. PMID: 32943370 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Little DC, Yoder SM, Grikscheit TC. Cost considerations and applicant characteristics for the Pediatric Surgery Match. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40:69–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.09.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chandler NM, Litz CN, Chang HL, Danielson PD. Efficacy of videoconference interviews in the pediatric surgery match. J Surg Educ. 2019;76:420–426. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.08.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watson SL, Hollis RH, Oladeji L, Xu S, Porterfield JR, Ponce BA. The burden of the fellowship interview process on general surgery residents and programs. J Surg Educ. 2017;74:167–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.06.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Downard CD, Goldin A, Garrison MM, Waldhausen J, Langham M, Hirschl R. Utility of onsite interviews in the pediatric surgery match. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50:1042–1045. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.03.036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shah SK, Arora S, Skipper B, Kalishman S, Timm TC, Smith AY. Randomized evaluation of a web based interview process for urology resident selection. J Urol. 2012;187:1380–1384. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.108. - DOI - PubMed