Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 5:11:542326.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.542326. eCollection 2020.

Experimentally Induced Language Modes and Regular Code-Switching Habits Boost Bilinguals' Executive Performance: Evidence From a Within-Subject Paradigm

Affiliations

Experimentally Induced Language Modes and Regular Code-Switching Habits Boost Bilinguals' Executive Performance: Evidence From a Within-Subject Paradigm

Julia Hofweber et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Bilingualism may modulate executive functions (EFs), but the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are poorly understood. In this study, we investigated two potential sources of variability in bilinguals' EF performance: (1) interactional contexts and code-switching, and (2) dominance profiles. Previous research on code-switching often relied on self-reports of regular code-switching habits. In this study, we investigated the effects of experimentally induced language modes (single language versus code-switching modes) on bilinguals' EF performance. Crucially, in the bilingual conditions, we differentiated between different types of intra-sentential code-switching (Insertion, Alternation, and Dense code-switching). Moreover, we investigated the interaction of the effects of temporary language modes with bilinguals' sociolinguistic code-switching habits. All our participants were L1-dominant German-English bilinguals (N = 29) immersed in an L2 context. We assessed the effects of dominance by correlating individual bilinguals' L1-dominance with their EF performance. In addition, we investigated whether language modes activate different EF patterns in bilinguals, as opposed to monolinguals, i.e., individuals who have no additional language to suppress. Based on models of bilingual language processing, we predicted our bilinguals to display the best EF performance in L2 single language contexts, as these require them to activate inhibitory schemata to suppress their dominant L1. Indeed, bilinguals performed better in the single language than in the code-switching conditions. The results also suggested that bilinguals activated more inhibitory control compared to monolinguals, supporting the notion that bilingual processing involves inhibition. The task conditions inducing different code-switching modes differed only in terms of the predictors explaining EF performance in the regression. We observed negative correlations between the frequency of engaging in a given type of code-switching and performance in language modes inducing non-corresponding control modes. The results suggested that Dense code-switching draws upon proactive control modes that differ from the reactive control involved in Alternation. Importantly, bilinguals' dominance profiles played a crucial role in explaining EF performance. The more balanced individuals in our overall L1-dominant sample displayed better EF performance in the bilingual conditions, suggesting that more balanced bilingualism trains the control modes involved in code-switching. This highlights the importance of assessing bilinguals' sociolinguistic profiles in bilingualism research.

Keywords: code-switching; cognition; executive functions; language modes; multilingualism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Reactive-proactive control continuum.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Individual trial verbal flanker task.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Frequency judgment task scores.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Correlation between the Conflict effect in the monolingual task block and Dense code-switching frequency.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Correlation between Accuracy rates in incongruent trials in the single-language condition and Dense code-switching frequency.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Correlation between the Conflict effect in the Alternational task block and Dense code-switching frequency.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Correlation between language balance and the Conflict effect in the bilingual mode.

References

    1. Abutalebi J., Green D. W. (2008). Control mechanisms in bilingual language production: neural evidence from language switching studies. Lang. Cogn. Process. 23 557–582. 10.1080/01690960801920602 - DOI
    1. Adler R. M., Valdés Kroff J. R., Novick J. M. (2020). Does integrating a code-switch during comprehension engage cognitive control? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 46 741–759. 10.1037/xlm0000755 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson J. A., Chung-Fat-Yim A., Bellana B., Luk G., Bialystok E. (2018). Language and cognitive control networks in bilinguals and monolinguals. Neuropsychologia 117 352–363. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.06.023 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Badiola L., Delgado R., Sande A., Stefanich S. (2018). Code-switching attitudes and their effects on acceptability judgment tasks. Linguist. Approaches Biling. 8 5–24. 10.1075/lab.16006.bad - DOI
    1. Bak T. H. (2016). Cooking pasta in La Paz. Linguist. Approaches Biling. 6 699–717. 10.1075/lab.16002.bak - DOI

LinkOut - more resources