Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 11;86(1):143.
doi: 10.5334/aogh.2926.

Using a Health Equity Lens to Evaluate Short-Term Experiences in Global Health (STEGH)

Affiliations

Using a Health Equity Lens to Evaluate Short-Term Experiences in Global Health (STEGH)

Vivian W L Tsang et al. Ann Glob Health. .

Abstract

Background: The growing popularity of short-term experiences in global health (STEGH) has given rise to increasing criticism around their purported benefits and outcomes. With the global health and development community's growing focus on improving population health and equity worldwide as outlined in the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals, there is a growing opportunity to examine and optimize the conduct of STEGH using an outcomes and equity focused lens.

Objectives: This viewpoint aims to develop a framework that can be used to plan and evaluate STEGH on outcomes underpinned by a health equity focus.

Methods: Drawing on logic model theory, the analysis first identifies extant issues and their drivers around the planning, implementation, and evaluation of tradition STEGH (focused on clinical service provision.) The analysis then explores various definitions of health equity, settling on a broad definition around context that promotes health for all as opposed to equity of access to healthcare services. With that definition as the ultimate benchmark of success, the analysis then proposes questions that can be used to determine how and when a STEGH might best be deployed to meet that goal.

Findings: Traditional reliance on process outputs from service-based approaches have historically limited an understanding of if and how STEGH might advance health equity. Using an outcomes-focused approach identifies critical questions around the value of such experiences, when weighed against a broad definition of equity and other key global health themes such as sustainability, cultural humility, and impact. Measuring STEGH against the goal of improving population health status and equity worldwide allows careful consideration of the appropriateness and effectiveness of such efforts on their own and in concert with other interventions.

Conclusions: The extent to which health equity is advanced should be the ultimate metric used to evaluate not only STEGH, but any global health endeavours.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dowell J, Merrylees N. Electives: Isn’t it time for a change? Med Educ. February 2009; 43(2): 121–126. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03253.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Provenzano AM, Graber LK, Elansary M, Khoshnood K, Rastegar A, Barry M. Short-term global health research projects by US medical students: Ethical challenges for partnerships. Am J Trop Med Hyg. August; 83(2): 211–214. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0692 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Melby MK, Loh LC, Evert J, Prater C, Lin H, Khan OA. Beyond medical “missions” to impact-driven Short-Term Experiences in Global Health (STEGHs): Ethical principles to optimize community benefit and learner experience. Acad Med. May 2016; 91(5): 633–638. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shah S, Lin HC, Loh LC. A comprehensive framework to optimize Short-Term Experiences in Global Health (STEGH). Global Health. April 2, 2019; 15(1): 27 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-019-0469-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sullivan N. International clinical volunteering in Tanzania: A postcolonial analysis of a Global Health business. Global Public Health. March 2018; 13(3): 310–324. DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2017.1346695 - DOI - PubMed