Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov 4:8:580868.
doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.580868. eCollection 2020.

Osteochondral Injury, Management and Tissue Engineering Approaches

Affiliations
Review

Osteochondral Injury, Management and Tissue Engineering Approaches

George Jacob et al. Front Cell Dev Biol. .

Abstract

Osteochondral lesions (OL) are a common clinical problem for orthopedic surgeons worldwide and are associated with multiple clinical scenarios ranging from trauma to osteonecrosis. OL vary from chondral lesions in that they involve the subchondral bone and chondral surface, making their management more complex than an isolated chondral injury. Subchondral bone involvement allows for a natural healing response from the body as marrow elements are able to come into contact with the defect site. However, this repair is inadequate resulting in fibrous scar tissue. The second differentiating feature of OL is that damage to the subchondral bone has deleterious effects on the mechanical strength and nutritive capabilities to the chondral joint surface. The clinical solution must, therefore, address both the articular cartilage as well as the subchondral bone beneath it to restore and preserve joint health. Both cartilage and subchondral bone have distinctive functional requirements and therefore their physical and biological characteristics are very much dissimilar, yet they must work together as one unit for ideal joint functioning. In the past, the obvious solution was autologous graft transfer, where an osteochondral bone plug was harvested from a non-weight bearing portion of the joint and implanted into the defect site. Allografts have been utilized similarly to eliminate the donor site morbidity associated with autologous techniques and overall results have been good but both techniques have their drawbacks and limitations. Tissue engineering has thus been an attractive option to create multiphasic scaffolds and implants. Biphasic and triphasic implants have been under explored and have both a chondral and subchondral component with an interface between the two to deliver an implant which is biocompatible and emulates the osteochondral unit as a whole. It has been a challenge to develop such implants and many manufacturing techniques have been utilized to bring together two unalike materials and combine them with cellular therapies. We summarize the functions of the osteochondral unit and describe the currently available management techniques under study.

Keywords: Mesenchymal stem cell; Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine; articular cartilage; multiphasic scaffold; osteochondral repair.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(A) Schematic Illustration of the anatomy of the osteochondral unit. (B) Histologic image of the osteochondral unit.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
List of functional roles each layer of the osteochondral unit performs.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The ideal osteochondral unit.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aigner T., Dudhia J. (1997). Phenotypic modulation of chondrocytes as a potential therapeutic target in osteoarthritis: a hypothesis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 56 287–291. 10.1136/ard.56.5.287 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ando W., Tateishi K., Hart D. A., Katakai D., Tanaka Y., Nakata K., et al. (2007). Cartilage repair using an in vitro generated scaffold-free tissue-engineered construct derived from porcine synovial mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 28 5462–5470. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.030 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Angele P., Schumann D., Angele M., Kinner B., Englert G., Hente R., et al. (2004). Cyclic, mechanical compression enhances chondrogenesis of mesenchymal progenitor cells in tissue engineering scaffolds. Biorheology 41 335–346. - PubMed
    1. Arvidson K., Abdallah B. M., Applegate L. A., Baldini N., Cenni E., Gomez-Barrena E., et al. (2011). Bone regeneration and stem cells. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 15 718–746. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01224.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ateshian G. A., Warden W. H., Kim J. J., Grelsamer R. P., Mow V. C. (1997). Finite deformation biphasic material properties of bovine articular cartilage from confined compression experiments. J. Biomech. 30 1157–1164. 10.1016/S0021-9290(97)85606-0 - DOI - PubMed