Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;41(2):258-270.
doi: 10.1002/pd.5874. Epub 2020 Dec 18.

Biometric assessments of the posterior fossa by fetal MRI: A systematic review

Katie Mckinnon  1   2 , Giles S Kendall  1   2 , Cally J Tann  1   3 , Leigh Dyet  1   2 , Magdalena Sokolska  2   4 , Kelly Pegoretti Baruteau  2   5 , Neil Marlow  1   2 , Nicola J Robertson  1   2 , Donald Peebles  2   6 , Latha Srinivasan  1   2
Affiliations

Biometric assessments of the posterior fossa by fetal MRI: A systematic review

Katie Mckinnon et al. Prenat Diagn. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Posterior fossa abnormalities (PFAs) are commonly identified within routine screening and are a frequent indication for fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although biometric measurements of the posterior fossa (PF) are established on fetal ultrasound and MRI, qualitative visual assessments are predominantly used to differentiate PFAs.

Objectives: This systematic review aimed to assess 2-dimensional (2D) biometric measurements currently in use for assessing the PF on fetal MRI to delineate different PFAs.

Methods: The protocol was registered (PROSPERO ID CRD42019142162). Eligible studies included T2-weighted MRI PF measurements in fetuses with and without PFAs, including measurements of the PF, or other brain areas relevant to PFAs.

Results: 59 studies were included - 6859 fetuses had 62 2D PF and related measurements. These included linear, area and angular measurements, representing measures of PF size, cerebellum/vermis, brainstem, and supratentorial measurements. 11 measurements were used in 10 or more studies and at least 1200 fetuses. These dimensions were used to characterise normal for gestational age, diagnose a range of pathologies, and predict outcome.

Conclusion: A selection of validated 2D biometric measurements of the PF on fetal MRI may be useful for identification of PFA in different clinical settings. Consistent use of these measures, both clinically and for research, is recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Garel C, Fallet-Bianco C, Guibaud L. The fetal cerebellum: development and common malformations. J Child Neurol. 2011;26(12):1483-1492.
    1. Rutherford MA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21(2):180-186.
    1. Limperopoulos C, Robertson RL, Khwaja OS, et al. How accurately does current fetal imaging identify posterior fossa anomalies? Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(6):1637-1643.
    1. Ber R, Bar-Yosef O, Hoffmann C, Shashar D, Achiron R, Katorza E. Normal fetal posterior fossa in MR imaging: new biometric data and possible clinical significance. Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(4):795-802.
    1. Hatab MR, Zaretsky MV, Alexander JM, Twickler DM. Comparison of fetal biometric values with sonographic and 3D reconstruction MRI in term gestations. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(2):340-345.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources