Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec;112(6):625-633.
doi: 10.1002/aorn.13250.

Preventing Retained Surgical Items During Endovascular Procedures: Bridging the Gap Between Guidelines and Practice

Kendal M Endicott, Rebekah Friedrich, Jason W Custer, Rajabrata Sarkar, Lisa Rowen, Megan G Anders
Review

Preventing Retained Surgical Items During Endovascular Procedures: Bridging the Gap Between Guidelines and Practice

Kendal M Endicott et al. AORN J. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

A retained surgical item (RSI) can be a devastating and costly procedural complication. Although the current incidence of RSIs is unknown, perioperative personnel routinely perform surgical counts according to their facility's policies and procedures to prevent this sentinel event. The American College of Surgeons, The Joint Commission, and AORN emphasize the importance of communication and standardized protocols for the counting of surgical items. However, there is a lack of current evidence to support specific recommendations for the counting of items during endovascular procedures. After the occurrence of RSIs during endovascular procedures at our facility, we convened an interdisciplinary workgroup, conducted an analysis of root causes, reviewed the available literature, and revised the existing policy. This article reviews the available literature on RSIs, describes root causes, discusses recommendations from national organizations, and describes the process that we used to create the policy changes at our facility.

Keywords: endovascular procedures; guidewire; retained surgical item (RSI); sentinel event; unintended retention of a foreign object (URFO).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. The Joint Commission. Summary Data of Sentinel Events Reviewed by The Joint Commission. https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/tjc/documents/resources/patient-.... Published July 1, 2019. Accessed August 3, 2020.
    1. Steelman VM, Shaw C, Shine L, Hardy-Fairbanks AJ. Unintentionally retained foreign objects: a descriptive study of 308 sentinel events and contributing factors. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019;45(4):249-258.
    1. Vannucci A, Jeffcoat A, Ifune C, Salinas C, Duncan JR, Wall M. Retained guidewires after intraoperative placement of central venous catheters. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(1):102-108.
    1. Peh WM, Loh WJ, Phua GC, Loo CM. Eliminating guidewire retention during ultrasound guided central venous catheter insertion via an educational program, a modified CVC set, and a drape with reminder stickers. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016;5:u209550.w3941. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u209550.w3941.
    1. Schummer W, Schummer C, Gaser E, Bartunek R. Loss of the guide wire: mishap or blunder? Br J Anaesth. 2002;88(1):144-146.

LinkOut - more resources