Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Nov 30;10(11):e040492.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040492.

Feasibility of reporting results of large randomised controlled trials to participants: experience from the Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision (FOCUS) trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Feasibility of reporting results of large randomised controlled trials to participants: experience from the Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision (FOCUS) trial

Gillian Mead et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Informing research participants of the results of studies in which they took part is viewed as an ethical imperative. However, there is little guidance in the literature about how to do this. The Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision trial randomised 3127 patients with a recent acute stroke to 6 months of fluoxetine or placebo and was published in the Lancet on 5 December 2018. The trial team decided to inform the participants of the results at exactly the same time as the Lancet publication, and also whether they had been allocated fluoxetine or placebo. In this report, we describe how we informed participants of the results.

Design: In the 6-month and 12-month follow-up questionnaires, we invited participants to provide an email address if they wished to be informed of the results of the trial. We re-opened our trial telephone helpline between 5 December 2018 and 31 March 2019.

Setting: UK stroke services.

Participants: 3127 participants were randomised. 2847 returned 6-month follow-up forms and 2703 returned 12-month follow-up forms; the remaining participants had died (380), withdrawn consent or did not respond.

Results: Of those returning follow-up questionnaires, a total of 1845 email addresses were provided and a further 50 people requested results to be sent by post. Results were sent to all email and postal addresses provided; 309 emails were returned unrecognised. Seventeen people replied, of whom three called the helpline and the rest responded by email.

Conclusion: It is feasible to disseminate results of large trials to research participants, though only around 60% of those randomised wanted to receive the results. The system we developed was efficient and required very little resource, and could be replicated by trialists in the future.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN83290762; Post-results.

Keywords: geriatric medicine; statistics & research methods; stroke medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Partridge AH, Winer EP. Informing clinical trial participants about study results. JAMA 2002;288:363–5. 10.1001/jama.288.3.363 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taylor J. Reporting research findings to participants. BMJ 2019;367:16324. - PubMed
    1. NIHR website Dissemination of results. Available: http://www.ct-toolkit.ac.uk/routemap/dissemination-of-results/ [Accessed 01 Dec 2019].
    1. Mancini J, Genre D, Dalenc F, et al. . Participants' uptake of clinical trial results: a randomised experiment. Br J Cancer 2010;102:1081–4. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605592 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. FOCUS Trial Collaboration Effects of fluoxetine on functional outcomes after acute stroke (focus): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2019;393:265–74. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32823-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources