Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 27;18(3):e99793.
doi: 10.5812/ijem.99793. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Glycemic Index (GI) Values for Major Sources of Dietary Carbohydrates in Iran

Affiliations

Glycemic Index (GI) Values for Major Sources of Dietary Carbohydrates in Iran

Fatemeh Kazemi et al. Int J Endocrinol Metab. .

Abstract

Background: The glycemic index (GI) values of staple foods are not available in a standardized method in Iran.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to measure the GI values of the major carbohydrate sources in a typical Iranian diet.

Methods: Using the international standard method, the GI values were determined for four wheat flatbreads, barley and rye bread, white and brown rice, as well as white and brown rice mixed with lentils. Twelve healthy adults were given 50 g anhydrous glucose three times (as the reference carbohydrate) and the test foods once each throughout the study. Using finger-prick blood samples, capillary blood glucose was measured using a reliable glucometer. The GI was calculated using the trapezoidal method.

Results: The GI values of the following types of bread were: Barley 66, Lavash 72, Taftoon 79, Sangak 82, rye 84, and Barbari 99. The GI values for brown and white rice were 65 and 71, respectively. The mixture of brown rice with lentils had a GI value of 55, and the mixture of white rice with lentils had a GI of 79.

Conclusions: The most common types of bread and white rice consumed in Iran have high GI values. There is potential to reduce the overall GI values in the Iranian diet by encouraging the consumption of barley bread and brown rice.

Keywords: Bread; Diet; Glycemic Index; Rice; Whole Grains.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Mean blood capillary glucose concentrations, (–––) for pure glucose solution and (- - - -) for test foods. Barbari (refined wheat bread), Sangak (wheat bread), Taftoon (refined wheat bread), Lavash (refined wheat bread), barley and rye bread, white rice, brown rice, a mixture of lentils with white rice, and a mixture of lentils with brown rice.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Afshin A, Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Fahimi S, Shi P, Powles J, et al. The impact of dietary habits and metabolic risk factors on cardiovascular and diabetes mortality in countries of the Middle East and North Africa in 2010: a comparative risk assessment analysis. BMJ Open. 2015;5(5):e006385. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006385. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Shi P, Andrews KG, Engell RE, Mozaffarian D, et al. Global, regional and national consumption of major food groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis including 266 country-specific nutrition surveys worldwide. BMJ Open. 2015;5(9):e008705. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008705. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mattei J, Malik VS, Wedic NM, Hu FB, Spiegelman D, Willett WC, et al. Reducing the global burden of type 2 diabetes by improving the quality of staple foods: The Global Nutrition and Epidemiologic Transition Initiative. Globalization and Health . 2015;11(23) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collaboration NCDRF Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. The Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1377–96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30054-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collaboration NCDRF Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4·4 million participants. The Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1513–30. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00618-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources