Upgrade from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator vs. de novo implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: long-term outcomes
- PMID: 33257952
- DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa339
Upgrade from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator vs. de novo implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: long-term outcomes
Abstract
Aims: To assess and compare long-term mortality and predictors thereof in de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) vs. upgrade from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) to CRT-D.
Methods and results: Study population consisted of 595 consecutive patients with CRT-D implanted between 2002 and 2015 in a tertiary care, university hospital, in a densely inhabited, urban region of Poland [480 subjects (84.3%) with CRT-D de novo implantation; 115 patients (15.7%) upgraded from ICD to CRT-D]. In a median observation of 1692 days (range 457-3067), all-cause mortality for de novo CRT-D vs. CRT-D upgrade was 35.5% vs. 43.5%, respectively (P = 0.045). On multivariable regression analysis including all CRT recipients, the previously implanted ICD was an independent predictor for death [hazard ratio (HR) 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-2.29, P = 0.02]. For those, who were upgraded from ICD to CRT-D, the independent predictors for all-cause death were as follows: creatinine level (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, P = 0.01), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.11, P = 0.002), New York Heart Association (NYHA) IV class at baseline (HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.00-5.53, P = 0.049) and cardiac device-related infective endocarditis during follow-up (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.02-5.75, P = 0.046). A new CRT scale (Creatinine ≥150 μmol/L; Remodelling, left ventricular end-systolic ≥59 mm; Threshold for NYHA, NYHA = IV) showed high prediction for mortality in CRT-D upgrades (AUC 0.70, 95% CI 0.59-0.80, P = 0.0007).
Conclusion: All-cause mortality in patients upgraded from ICD is significantly higher compared with de novo CRT-D implantations and reaches almost 45% within 4.5 years. A new CRT scale (Creatinine; Remodelling; Threshold for NYHA) has been proposed to help survival prediction following CRT upgrade.
Keywords: Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Mortality predictors; Upgrade from cardioverter-defibrillator to resynchronization therapy device.
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
Outcome in patients undergoing upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy: predictors of outcome after upgrade to CRT.Heart Vessels. 2020 Jan;35(1):104-109. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01449-3. Epub 2019 Jun 21. Heart Vessels. 2020. PMID: 31227877
-
Incidence, predictors, and procedural results of upgrade to resynchronization therapy: the RAFT upgrade substudy.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Feb;8(1):152-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001997. Epub 2014 Nov 23. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015. PMID: 25417892 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of left ventricular lead upgrade vs continued medical care among patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy at the time of defibrillator generator replacement: Predictors of left ventricular lead upgrade and associations with long-term outcomes.Heart Rhythm. 2020 Nov;17(11):1878-1886. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.05.032. Epub 2020 Jun 1. Heart Rhythm. 2020. PMID: 32497762
-
De novo implantation vs. upgrade cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart Fail Rev. 2018 Jan;23(1):15-26. doi: 10.1007/s10741-017-9652-1. Heart Fail Rev. 2018. PMID: 29047028 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy and implantable cardioverter defibrillator on quality of life in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis.Europace. 2012 Nov;14(11):1602-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus168. Europace. 2012. PMID: 23104857 Review.
Cited by
-
One-Year Mortality in Patients Undergoing an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pulse Generator Replacement: Identifying Patients at Risk.J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 30;12(17):5654. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175654. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37685719 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of upgrade left bundle branch area pacing for right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: Extra QRS shortening matters.J Arrhythm. 2025 Feb 13;41(1):e70017. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70017. eCollection 2025 Feb. J Arrhythm. 2025. PMID: 39950145 Free PMC article.
-
Upgrading right ventricular pacemakers to biventricular pacing or conduction system pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Europace. 2023 Mar 30;25(3):1077-1086. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac188. Europace. 2023. PMID: 36352513 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials