Endoscopic lithotripsy with a SuperPulsed thulium-fiber laser for ureteral stones: A single-center experience
- PMID: 33258271
- DOI: 10.1111/iju.14443
Endoscopic lithotripsy with a SuperPulsed thulium-fiber laser for ureteral stones: A single-center experience
Abstract
Objectives: To estimate the efficacy and safety of SuperPulsed thulium-fiber laser ureteral lithotripsy and to identify optimal laser settings.
Methods: Patients with solitary stones were prospectively included. Lithotripsy was performed with a SuperPulsed thulium-fiber laser (NTO IRE-Polus, Fryazino, Russia) using a rigid ureteroscope 7.5 Ch (Richard Wolf, Knittlingen, Germany). We analyzed the efficacy of lithotripsy by measuring total energy required for stone disintegration, "laser-on" time, ablation speed, ablation efficacy, and energy consumption. Stone retropulsion and visibility were assessed using a three-point Likert scale. Complications were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification system.
Results: A total of 149 patients were included. The mean stone density was 985 ± 360 Hounsfield units, the median (interquartile range) stone volume was 179 (94-357) mm3 . The median (interquartile range) total energy was 1 (0.4-2) kJ, and laser-on time 1.2 (0.5-2.7) min. The median (interquartile range) stone ablation speed was 140 (80-279) mm3 /min, energy for ablation of 1 mm3 was 5.6 (3-9.9) J/mm3 and energy consumption was 0.9 (0.6-1) J/min. A correlation was found between retropulsion and the energy used (r = 0.5, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed energy to be a predictor of increased retropulsion (odds ratio 65.7, 95% confidence interval 1.6-2774.1; P = 0.028). No predictors for worse visibility were identified.
Conclusion: The SuperPulsed thulium-fiber laser provides effective and safe lithotripsy during ureteroscopy regardless of stone density. Fiber diameter and laser frequency do not influence visibility or safety. Optimal laser settings are 0.5 J × 30 Hz for fragmentation and 0.15 J × 100 Hz for dusting.
Keywords: kidney stone disease; lithotripsy; thulium fiber laser; ureteral stones.
© 2020 The Japanese Urological Association.
Comment in
-
Editorial Comment from Dr Taguchi to Endoscopic lithotripsy with a SuperPulsed thulium-fiber laser for ureteral stones: A single-center experience.Int J Urol. 2021 Mar;28(3):266-267. doi: 10.1111/iju.14459. Epub 2020 Dec 2. Int J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33269479 No abstract available.
-
Editorial Comment from Dr Corrales and Dr Traxer to Endoscopic lithotripsy with a SuperPulsed thulium-fiber laser for ureteral stones: A single-center experience.Int J Urol. 2021 Mar;28(3):267. doi: 10.1111/iju.14465. Epub 2020 Dec 15. Int J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33321552 No abstract available.
References
-
- Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL et al. Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. PART II. J. Urol. 2016; 196: 1161-9.
-
- Taguchi K, Cho SY, Ng ACF et al. The Urological Association of Asia clinical guideline for urinary stone disease. Int. J. Urol. 2019; 26: 688-709.
-
- Kam J, Jackson S, Yuminaga Y, Winter M, Khadra M, Ko R. Long pulse-width setting improves holmium-YAG laser lithotripsy - enhanced fragmentation and retropulsion characteristics of renal calculi in a novel in-vivo setting. Surg. Technol. Int. 2020; 37: 169-71.
-
- Garg S, Mandal AK, Singh SK et al. Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus ballistic lithotripsy for treatment of ureteric stones: A prospective comparative study. Urol. Int. 2009; 82: 341-5.
-
- Leijte JAP, Oddens JR, Lock TMTW. Holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: predictive factors for complications and success. J. Endourol. 2008; 22: 257-60.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical