Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;28(3):261-265.
doi: 10.1111/iju.14443. Epub 2020 Nov 30.

Endoscopic lithotripsy with a SuperPulsed thulium-fiber laser for ureteral stones: A single-center experience

Affiliations

Endoscopic lithotripsy with a SuperPulsed thulium-fiber laser for ureteral stones: A single-center experience

Dmitry Enikeev et al. Int J Urol. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the efficacy and safety of SuperPulsed thulium-fiber laser ureteral lithotripsy and to identify optimal laser settings.

Methods: Patients with solitary stones were prospectively included. Lithotripsy was performed with a SuperPulsed thulium-fiber laser (NTO IRE-Polus, Fryazino, Russia) using a rigid ureteroscope 7.5 Ch (Richard Wolf, Knittlingen, Germany). We analyzed the efficacy of lithotripsy by measuring total energy required for stone disintegration, "laser-on" time, ablation speed, ablation efficacy, and energy consumption. Stone retropulsion and visibility were assessed using a three-point Likert scale. Complications were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification system.

Results: A total of 149 patients were included. The mean stone density was 985 ± 360 Hounsfield units, the median (interquartile range) stone volume was 179 (94-357) mm3 . The median (interquartile range) total energy was 1 (0.4-2) kJ, and laser-on time 1.2 (0.5-2.7) min. The median (interquartile range) stone ablation speed was 140 (80-279) mm3 /min, energy for ablation of 1 mm3 was 5.6 (3-9.9) J/mm3 and energy consumption was 0.9 (0.6-1) J/min. A correlation was found between retropulsion and the energy used (r = 0.5, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed energy to be a predictor of increased retropulsion (odds ratio 65.7, 95% confidence interval 1.6-2774.1; P = 0.028). No predictors for worse visibility were identified.

Conclusion: The SuperPulsed thulium-fiber laser provides effective and safe lithotripsy during ureteroscopy regardless of stone density. Fiber diameter and laser frequency do not influence visibility or safety. Optimal laser settings are 0.5 J × 30 Hz for fragmentation and 0.15 J × 100 Hz for dusting.

Keywords: kidney stone disease; lithotripsy; thulium fiber laser; ureteral stones.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL et al. Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. PART II. J. Urol. 2016; 196: 1161-9.
    1. Taguchi K, Cho SY, Ng ACF et al. The Urological Association of Asia clinical guideline for urinary stone disease. Int. J. Urol. 2019; 26: 688-709.
    1. Kam J, Jackson S, Yuminaga Y, Winter M, Khadra M, Ko R. Long pulse-width setting improves holmium-YAG laser lithotripsy - enhanced fragmentation and retropulsion characteristics of renal calculi in a novel in-vivo setting. Surg. Technol. Int. 2020; 37: 169-71.
    1. Garg S, Mandal AK, Singh SK et al. Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus ballistic lithotripsy for treatment of ureteric stones: A prospective comparative study. Urol. Int. 2009; 82: 341-5.
    1. Leijte JAP, Oddens JR, Lock TMTW. Holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: predictive factors for complications and success. J. Endourol. 2008; 22: 257-60.

LinkOut - more resources