Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;19(3):167-173.
doi: 10.1089/met.2020.0109. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

Triglyceride Glucose Index and Related Parameters (Triglyceride Glucose-Body Mass Index and Triglyceride Glucose-Waist Circumference) Identify Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver and Liver Fibrosis in Individuals with Overweight/Obesity

Affiliations

Triglyceride Glucose Index and Related Parameters (Triglyceride Glucose-Body Mass Index and Triglyceride Glucose-Waist Circumference) Identify Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver and Liver Fibrosis in Individuals with Overweight/Obesity

Mohammad E Khamseh et al. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The triglyceride glucose (TyG) index has been proposed as a reliable surrogate marker for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Furthermore, NAFLD is strongly related with obesity. This study aimed to compare TyG index and its related parameters (TyG-waist circumference [WC] and TyG-body mass index [BMI]), comprising TyG and obesity markers, in predicting NAFLD and liver fibrosis in overweight/obese individuals without diabetes. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study consisting of 184 overweight/obese people (96 with and 88 without NAFLD), 30-65 years of age. TyG, TyG-BMI, and TyG-WC were computed using the established formula. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) were determined by transient elastography (FibroScan). Results: In correlation analyses, CAP and LSM were significantly associated with WC, BMI, TyG, TyG-BMI, and TyG-WC. Regression analyses highlighted TyG-WC as a significant predictor of NAFLD, with the highest standardized odds ratio (2.25, P < 0.001); while liver fibrosis was associated more strongly with TyG-BMI. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, TyG-WC showed the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC) for detection of NAFLD (0.693, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.617-0.769). However, TyG-BMI was a better discriminator of liver fibrosis (AUC: 0.635, 95% CI: 0.554-0.714). TyG-WC value of 876 (sensitivity: 81.3%, specificity: 52.3%) and TyG-BMI value of 259 (sensitivity: 78.3%, specificity: 51.3%) were the optimal cutoff points to predict NAFLD and liver fibrosis, respectively. Conclusions: The results highlight the significant associations of TyG and its related indices with NAFLD, with TyG-WC being a better indicator. TyG-BMI and TyG-WC could reliably predict liver fibrosis in this population. These indices appear to be simple, practical, and affordable tools for screening NAFLD and liver fibrosis in clinical settings.

Keywords: NAFLD; TyG; TyG-BMI; TyG-WC; liver fibrosis; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources