Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 28;10(12):2237.
doi: 10.3390/ani10122237.

Social License and Animal Welfare: Developments from the Past Decade in Australia

Affiliations

Social License and Animal Welfare: Developments from the Past Decade in Australia

Jordan O Hampton et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

"Social license to operate" (SLO) refers to the implicit process by which a community gives an industry approval to conduct its current business activities. It has become an important focus for many natural resource management fields (especially mining), but there is less awareness of its role in animal use industries. This article describes how animal welfare has recently become arguably the most crucial consideration underpinning the SLO for Australian animal use industries. It describes several industries in Australia that have faced animal welfare scrutiny in the past decade (2010-2020) to illustrate how persistent issues can erode SLO, lead to regulatory bans, and decimate previously profitable industries. Industries described include the live export of livestock, greyhound and horse racing, kangaroo harvesting, and dairy and sheep farming. In these cases, there has been intense public discourse but little scholarly progress. This article examines factors that may have contributed to these developments and suggests approaches that may assist these industries in maintaining their SLO. Animal welfare has become a mainstream societal concern in Australia, and effective management of the community's expectations will be essential for the maintenance of SLO for many animal use industries.

Keywords: cattle; dairy; greyhounds; horses; kangaroos; public perceptions; racing; sheep.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Coleman G. Public animal welfare discussions and outlooks in Australia. Anim. Front. 2018;8:14–19. doi: 10.1093/af/vfx004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sinclair M., Derkley T., Fryer C., Phillips C.J. Australian public opinions regarding the live export trade before and after an animal welfare media exposé. Animals. 2018;8:106. doi: 10.3390/ani8070106. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schoenmaker S., Alexander D. Live cattle trade-the case of an online crisis. Soc. Altern. 2012;31:17–21.
    1. Markwell K., Firth T., Hing N. Blood on the race track: An analysis of ethical concerns regarding animal-based gambling. Ann. Leis. Res. 2017;20:594–609. doi: 10.1080/11745398.2016.1251326. - DOI
    1. McHugh M. Special Commission of Inquiry into the Greyhound Racing Industry in New South Wales. New South Wales Department of Justice; Sydney, Australia: 2016.

LinkOut - more resources