Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 27;10(4):253.
doi: 10.3390/jpm10040253.

Cognitive Insight in First-Episode Psychosis: Changes during Metacognitive Training

Affiliations

Cognitive Insight in First-Episode Psychosis: Changes during Metacognitive Training

Irene Birulés et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

Background: Metacognitive training (MCT) has demonstrated its efficacy in psychosis. However, the effect of each MCT session has not been studied. The aim of the study was to assess changes in cognitive insight after MCT: (a) between baseline, post-treatment, and follow-up; (b) after each session of the MCT controlled for intellectual quotient (IQ) and educational level.

Method: A total of 65 patients with first-episode psychosis were included in the MCT group from nine centers of Spain. Patients were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and 6 months follow-up, as well as after each session of MCT with the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS). The BCIS contains two subscales: self-reflectiveness and self-certainty, and the Composite Index. Statistical analysis was performed using linear mixed models with repeated measures at different time points.

Results: Self-certainty decreased significantly (p = 0.03) over time and the effect of IQ was negative and significant (p = 0.02). From session 4 to session 8, all sessions improved cognitive insight by significantly reducing self-certainty and the Composite Index.

Conclusions: MCT intervention appears to have beneficial effects on cognitive insight by reducing self-certainty, especially after four sessions. Moreover, a minimum IQ is required to ensure benefits from MCT group intervention.

Keywords: cognitive insight; experiment; first-episode psychosis; metacognitive training; sessions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Research process flow-chart. MCT, metacognitive training.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in self-certainty (SC) in every session and in the post-treatment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean of self-reflectiveness (SR) in each session and in the post-treatment.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean of the Composite Index (CI) in each session and in the post-treatment.

References

    1. Serafini G., Pompili M., Haghighat R., Pucci D., Pastina M., Lester D., Angeletti G., Tatarelli R., Girardi P. Stigmatization of schizophrenia as perceived by nurses, medical doctors, medical students and patients. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs. 2011;18:576–585. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01706.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fusar-Poli P., Smieskova R., Serafini G., Politi P., Borgwardt S. Neuroanatomical markers of genetic liability to psychosis and first episode psychosis: A voxelwise meta-analytical comparison. World J. Biol. Psychiatry. 2014;15:219–228. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2011.630408. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fornells-Ambrojo M., Garety P.A. Understanding attributional biases, emotions and self-esteem in “poor me” paranoia: Findings from an early psychosis sample. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 2009;48:141–162. doi: 10.1348/014466508X377135. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Langdon R., Still M., Connors M.H., Ward P.B., Catts S.V. Attributional biases, paranoia, and depression in early psychosis. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 2013;52:408–423. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaney S., Bentall R.P. Persecutory delusions and the self-serving bias: Evidence from a contingency judgment task. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 1992;180:773–780. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199212000-00006. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources