Digital tools as promoters for person-centered care practices in chronic care? Healthcare professionals' experiences from rheumatology care
- PMID: 33261602
- PMCID: PMC7709268
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05945-5
Digital tools as promoters for person-centered care practices in chronic care? Healthcare professionals' experiences from rheumatology care
Abstract
Background: Person-centered care (PCC) emphasize the importance of supporting individuals' involvement in care provided and self-care. PCC has become more important in chronic care as the number of people living with chronic conditions is increasing due to the demographic changes. Digital tools have potential to support interaction between patients and healthcare providers, but empirical examples of how to achieve PCC in chronic care and the role of digital tools in this process is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate strategies to achieve PCC used by the healthcare professionals at an outpatient Rheumatology clinic (RC), the strategies' relation to digital tools, and the perceived impact of the strategies on healthcare professionals and patients.
Methods: A single case study design was used. The qualitative data consisted of 14 semi-structured interviews and staff meeting minutes, covering the time period 2017-2019. The data were analyzed using conventional content analysis, complemented with document analyses.
Results: Ten strategies on two levels to operationalize PCC, and three categories of perceived impact were identified. On the individual patient level strategies involved several digital tools focusing on flexible access to care, mutual information sharing and the distribution of initiatives, tasks, and responsibilities from provider to patients. On the unit level, strategies concerned involving patient representatives and individual patients in development of digital services and work practices. The roles of both professionals and patients were affected and the importance of behavioral and cultural change became clear.
Conclusions: By providing an empirical example from chronic care the study contributes to the knowledge on strategies for achieving PCC, how digital tools and work practices interact, and how they can affect healthcare staff, patients and the unit. A conclusion is that the use of the digital tools, spanning over different dimensions of engagement, facilitated the healthcare professionals' interaction with patients and the patients' involvement in their own care. Digital tools complemented, rather than replaced, care practices.
Keywords: Chronic care; Digital tools; Improvement; Patient-centered care; Person-centered care.
Conflict of interest statement
No conflicts of interest to declare.
Similar articles
-
How to deliver person-centred care for people living with heart failure: a multi stakeholder interview study with patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals in Thailand.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1570. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11922-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39696212 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Differences in Patient-Centered Practices among Healthcare Professionals in Acute Care Settings.Health Commun. 2018 Jun;33(6):716-723. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1306476. Epub 2017 Apr 12. Health Commun. 2018. PMID: 28402138
-
Healthcare professionals' views on patient-centered care in hospitals.BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 16;15:385. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1049-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015. PMID: 26373841 Free PMC article.
-
Digital First Primary Care for those with multiple long-term conditions: a rapid review of the views of stakeholders.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(21):1-68. doi: 10.3310/AWBT4827. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024. PMID: 39056123 Review.
-
Person-Centered Care From a Relational Ethics Perspective for the Delivery of High Quality and Safe Healthcare: A Scoping Review.Front Public Health. 2020 Mar 6;8:44. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00044. eCollection 2020. Front Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32211362 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Patient Assessment Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and its associations with quality of life among Swiss patients with systemic sclerosis: a mixed methods study.Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Jan 9;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02604-2. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023. PMID: 36624535 Free PMC article.
-
Key drivers involved in the telemonitoring of covid-19 for self-health management: an exploratory factor analysis.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07828-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35440043 Free PMC article.
-
How the current non-significant effects of person-centred care on nurses' outcomes could be abated by the WE-CARE roadmap enablers: A discursive paper.Nurs Open. 2023 Apr;10(4):2044-2052. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1500. Epub 2022 Nov 28. Nurs Open. 2023. PMID: 36440684 Free PMC article.
-
Rewiring care delivery through Digital Therapeutics (DTx): a machine learning-enhanced assessment and development (M-LEAD) framework.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 23;24(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10702-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38395905 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies that enabled access to chronic care during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond in South Africa.Health SA. 2024 Mar 29;29:2412. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2412. eCollection 2024. Health SA. 2024. PMID: 38628228 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. - PubMed
-
- Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW Jr, Bandura A, Ritter P, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care. 1999;37:5–14. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources