Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 1;20(1):1108.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05945-5.

Digital tools as promoters for person-centered care practices in chronic care? Healthcare professionals' experiences from rheumatology care

Affiliations

Digital tools as promoters for person-centered care practices in chronic care? Healthcare professionals' experiences from rheumatology care

Emma Granström et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Person-centered care (PCC) emphasize the importance of supporting individuals' involvement in care provided and self-care. PCC has become more important in chronic care as the number of people living with chronic conditions is increasing due to the demographic changes. Digital tools have potential to support interaction between patients and healthcare providers, but empirical examples of how to achieve PCC in chronic care and the role of digital tools in this process is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate strategies to achieve PCC used by the healthcare professionals at an outpatient Rheumatology clinic (RC), the strategies' relation to digital tools, and the perceived impact of the strategies on healthcare professionals and patients.

Methods: A single case study design was used. The qualitative data consisted of 14 semi-structured interviews and staff meeting minutes, covering the time period 2017-2019. The data were analyzed using conventional content analysis, complemented with document analyses.

Results: Ten strategies on two levels to operationalize PCC, and three categories of perceived impact were identified. On the individual patient level strategies involved several digital tools focusing on flexible access to care, mutual information sharing and the distribution of initiatives, tasks, and responsibilities from provider to patients. On the unit level, strategies concerned involving patient representatives and individual patients in development of digital services and work practices. The roles of both professionals and patients were affected and the importance of behavioral and cultural change became clear.

Conclusions: By providing an empirical example from chronic care the study contributes to the knowledge on strategies for achieving PCC, how digital tools and work practices interact, and how they can affect healthcare staff, patients and the unit. A conclusion is that the use of the digital tools, spanning over different dimensions of engagement, facilitated the healthcare professionals' interaction with patients and the patients' involvement in their own care. Digital tools complemented, rather than replaced, care practices.

Keywords: Chronic care; Digital tools; Improvement; Patient-centered care; Person-centered care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):37–43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Epping-Jordan J, Pruitt S, Bengoa R, Wagner EH. Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions. BMJ Quality Safety. 2004;13(4):299–305. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.010744. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. - PubMed
    1. Longtin Y, Sax H, Leape LL, Sheridan SE, Donaldson L, Pittet D, editors. Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety. Mayo Clin Proc; 2010: Elsevier. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW Jr, Bandura A, Ritter P, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care. 1999;37:5–14. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources